Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Michael Palmisciano was quoted in the article, "High Court's 'Bad Spaniels' Decision Offers Warning to Creators in Commercial Space," published by The National Law Journal [sub. req.d].

The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products, which offered a rare mix of constitutional and trademark law. The high court sided with Jack Daniel’s, saying VIP Products’ “Bad Spaniels” dog chew toy borrowed too much from—and failed to properly parody—the Tennessee distillery’s well-known bottle.

Mike was particularly pleased with the decision, saying the court pulled away a "get out of jail free" card that creators may have relied on if the justices had gone the other way. "For brand owners, the court affirmed that likelihood of confusion is the touchstone for trademark infringement claims under the Lanham Act," he said.