Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Biography

John's practice focuses on the representation of mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), closed-end funds and business development companies (BDCs) and their independent board members. He advises clients on a range of matters, including the formation, operation, merger and liquidation of mutual funds, closed-end funds, ETFs, and BDCs. John has extensive experience working on transactions involving registered funds, such as adviser acquisitions, fund adoptions and product launches. 

Education
  • The George Washington University Law School (J.D.)
  • Williams College (B.A.)
    • cum laude
Bar & Court Admissions
  • District of Columbia
  • New York
Awards & Honors
  • Best Lawyers in America® (2024-2026)
  • Recommended by The Legal 500 U.S. (2012-2013, 2016, 2018-2025)
Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
Ramifications of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Open-End Investment Companies
By Domenick Pugliese and Rachael Schwartz As the outbreak of COVID-19 has spread internationally, it has impacted almost every facet of life in the United States. Financial markets too have been severely impacted with extreme levels of volatility and, for most broad market indices, the end of the recent long-running bull market. Registered investment companies such as mutual funds ("funds"), and the advisers who manage them, have also seen significant disruptions to many aspects of their businesses and operations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") has been proactive in providing relief to funds, fund boards and to investment advisers in a number of areas. Below we review some of the more significant regulatory-related initiatives implemented in the past few days by the Commission to relieve certain burdens on funds, boards and advisers. We also highlight certain questions or areas of focus which boards may wish to discuss with management in the upcoming weeks. Finally, as travel restrictions have taken wide-spread effect across the country, many boards will be looking to conduct their meetings by video or telephone conference in the coming months. We provide certain practical tips for boards and management to consider when converting the next in-person board meeting to a video or telephonic meeting. Regulatory Developments On March 13, 2020, the Commission issued an order (the "Emergency Order") providing funds, fund boards and advisers with temporary relief from certain requirement of the Investment Company Act. RELIEF RELATING TO THE IN-PERSON VOTING REQUIREMENT The Emergency Order provides that – until June 15, 2020—funds, boards and advisers will be exempt from the requirement that the following approvals must be done at an in-person meeting: Initial or annual continuance of the investment advisory (or sub-advisory) agreement or any material amendments thereto; Approval of the agreement with the principal underwriter; Approval of the auditors; Approval of 12b-1 plans or material amendments to 12b-1 plans; and Approval of interim investment advisory agreement caused by a change in control where the adviser or its controlling person receives money or other benefit. In order to take advantage of this relief, any such action must be taken at a telephonic meeting or video conference where all directors can hear each other simultaneously. At this meeting, the board must conclude that reliance on the Emergency Order is necessary or appropriate due to circumstances related to current or potential effects of COVID-19. Finally, any matters approved in reliance on the Emergency Order must be ratified at the next in-person meeting by the board, including by a majority of independent Trustees. RELIEF FROM FILING DEADLINES FOR FORM N-CEN AND N-PORT The Emergency Order provides that, with respect to funds that are required to make filings of either Form-N-CEN or N-PORT on or prior to April 30, 2020 (but after March 12, 2020), the deadline for such filing will be extended to no more than 45 days after the original due date provided: The fund determines it is unable to meet the original filing deadline due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19; The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it could not file the report on a timely basis; The estimated date by which it expects to file the report (the fund is required to file the report prior to the maximum 45 extension deadline if it is able to do so); The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with the reasons it could not file the report on a timely basis; and Once filed, the report must include a statement that the fund relied on the Emergency Order and the reasons why it was unable to file the report on a timely basis. RELIEF WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OR TRANSMITTAL OF ANNUAL AND SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS The Emergency Order provides that, with respect to funds that are required to transmit annual or semi-annual reports to shareholders on or prior to April 30, 2020 (but after March 12, 2020), the deadline for such transmittal will be extended to no more than 45 days after the original due date provided: The fund determines it is unable to prepare or transmit the report by the original deadline due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19; The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it could not transmit the report on a timely basis; The estimated date by which it expects to transmit the report (the fund is required to transmit the report prior to the maximum 45 extension deadline if it is able to do so); The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with the reasons it could not prepare or transmit the report on a timely basis; and The fund files the report with the Commission within 10 days of its transmission to shareholder. RELIEF RELATING TO PROSPECTUS DELIVERY Finally, the Emergency Order contains a statement from the Commission whereby it announced that the Commission has taken the position that it would not provide a basis for a Commission enforcement action if a registered fund does not deliver a current prospectus to investors under the following circumstances: The fund determines it is unable to deliver the prospectus on a timely basis due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19 The sale of shares to the investor was NOT an initial purchase by the investor of shares of the fund The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it or any other person required to deliver the prospectus could not deliver the prospectus on a timely basis The estimated date by which it expects to deliver the prospectus The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Commission position along with the reasons it could not deliver the prospectus on a timely basis, Publishes the current prospectus on its website, and The fund was required to deliver the prospectus on or prior to April 30, 2020 and after March 12, 2020 and the prospectus will be transmitted to shareholders as soon as practicable but no later than 45 days after the original date required. Questions and Areas of Focus for Boards Relating to COVID-19 In the wake of the extreme market volatility and other uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, there are certain areas of focus and questions that boards may want to explore with management and advisers with respect to the funds they oversee. Some of these questions and areas of focus might include: Does the adviser have appropriate and effective business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place to ensure there will be no business disruption if employees have to work remotely for an extended period of time? Has the adviser had to implement its business continuity plan as of yet? If so, have any issues been uncovered?  If not, is there increased testing to ensure that the adviser will be able to continue business operations without disruption? How has the fund’s liquidity risk management program held up in the recent market volatility? Have there been any issues meeting shareholder redemptions? Have redemptions spiked? Has there been increased call-center activity and how responsive has the call center been throughout this period? Have there been any issues with the fund’s third-party services providers, particular with respect to calculating the fund’s NAV each day? Have you had recent discussions with them about implementation of their business continuity plans and are you comfortable they can continue providing services to the fund? With the recent market volatility has there been any valuation issues? Have pricing services continued to operate and provide pricing is an acceptable manner? Has the fund’s most significant pricing services implemented their business continuity plans? Have portfolio managers of any funds encountered any significant portfolio management issues or challenges as a result of the coronavirus or market volatility, and if so, what actions have been taken? Has the adviser taken any steps to mitigate risk for any funds that have significant exposure to regions, sectors or industries that are being most affected by the coronavirus outbreak? Has the adviser put any travel restrictions in place related to portfolio manager and/or compliance due diligence trips and how is that impacting operations? Does the adviser or management see the need at this time to take advantage of any of the relief provided by the Commission in the Emergency Order? Considerations when Setting up Telephonic and Video Meetings As funds take advantage of the Emergency Order to turn their next in-person meetings into telephonic or video conferences, boards and management may wish to restructure certain portions of their meetings to better accommodate the telephone or video structure of the meetings. Many board meetings typically run 6-10 hours day and may last one or more days. In this light, it may be appropriate for boards and management to consider the following: Consider revising the meeting agenda to defer until the next in-person meeting certain agenda items which might engender a better discussion in the in-person context, such as matters relating to new business initiatives, product restructurings, fund family product rationalizations, marketing initiatives and the like; In an effort to keep the meeting manageable from the perspective of length and maintaining maximum attention span throughout the call, consider limiting verbal presentations to a critical few, with question and answer format set aside for more routine matters for which written reports have been provided; Consider scheduling a number of breaks through-out the session; Consider instructing all Trustees to inform the board if they need to step out of the meeting for any period of time; Limit participation in the meeting to critical participants and instruct all participants when speaking, to be sure to pause frequently to allow for questions. Participants need to understand that if they do not pause occasionally for questions, other participants may have difficulty breaking in with questions; Be sure that all meeting materials are provided well in advance of the meetings, with none provided only at the meeting. For example, even if technology is used which allows for all participants to simultaneously view presentations during the meeting, consider requiring that such presentations must also be provided in advance of the meeting; and If executive sessions are to be part of the meeting, consider using a technology which can confirm which parties are participating in the meeting at a given time. The situation surrounding COVID-19 remain fluid and fast developing. It is important that all Trustees remain abreast of developments and their potential impact on the funds they oversee.
44 Sullivan & Worcester Lawyers Named as “Best Lawyers” Award Recipients
Boston MA – Sullivan & Worcester today announced that 44 lawyers were recognized in the 2026 edition of Best Lawyers in America®. Three Sullivan partners also earned the 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” recognition from The Best Lawyers in America®. 39 of the firm’s lawyers in Boston, New York and Washington, D.C. were named as “Best Lawyers in America®,” and five Sullivan lawyers were recognized as “Ones to Watch” in the U.S. Lawyers of the Year David Nagle, managing partner of Sullivan, Amy Sheridan, and Lewis Segall were selected as "Lawyer of the Year" in Boston for Litigation and Controversy – Tax, Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, and Mergers and Acquisitions Law, respectively. Only one lawyer is recognized as a "Lawyer of the Year" in each practice area and geographic location. These individuals are notable for receiving significantly higher ratings in Best Lawyers’ rigorous assessment process among the thousands of leading lawyers peer-reviewed in their markets. Best Lawyers in America® The firm’s 2026 Best Lawyers in Boston include Victor Baltera (Real Estate Law); Howard Berkenblit (Corporate Governance Law, Corporate Law); Harvey Bines (Corporate Compliance Law, Corporate Governance Law); Ashley Brooks (Real Estate Law); Joel Carpenter (Tax Law); Henry Comstock Jr. (Trusts and Estates); Christopher Curtis (Tax Law); Patrick Dinardo (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation – Bankruptcy); John Graham (Nonprofit / Charities Law, Tax Law); Ira Gross (Commercial Litigation); David Guadagnoli (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, Tax Law); Warren Heilbronner (Real Estate Law); Zachary Hyde (Patent Law); Richard Jones (Tax Law); Karen Kepler (Real Estate Law), Caroline Kupiec (Tax Law); Thomas Meyers (Patent Law); Lisa Mingolla (Trusts and Estates); Louis Monti (Real Estate Law); Cornelius Murray III (Trusts and Estates); David Nagle (Litigation and Controversy – Tax, Tax Law); Nicholas O'Donnell (Commercial Litigation); Ameek Ashok Ponda (Tax Law); Gregory Sampson (Environmental Law, Land Use and Zoning Law, Real Estate Law); Lewis Segall (Mergers and Acquisitions Law); Amy Sheridan (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law); Laura Steinberg (Commercial Litigation); Sarah Wellings (Tax Law) and Amy Zuccarello (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation – Bankruptcy). Sullivan’s 2026 Best Lawyers in Washington, D.C. include John Chilton (Mutual Funds); Cameron Cosby (Tax); Nicole Crum (Mutual Funds); David Leahy (Mutual Funds); David Mahaffey (Mutual Funds & Securities Regulation); and Stephanie Monaco (Corporate, Mutual Funds, Private Funds / Hedge Funds, & Securities Regulation). The firm’s 2026 honorees in New York include Carole Bass (Trusts and Estates); J. Truman Bidwell, Jr. (Corporate); Domenick Pugliese (Mutual Funds); and Constantine Ralli (Trusts and Estates). Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch Awardees Best Lawyers awards this recognition to attorneys who are earlier in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. Sullivan’s five lawyers earning this award include Alexander Gansebom (Corporate Governance and Compliance Law, Corporate Law, Health Care Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law, Real Estate Law); Emily Goldschmidt (Corporate Law); Ryan Rosenblatt (Commercial Litigation); Ashley Tan (Real Estate Law); and Eric Victorson (Securities / Capital Markets Law). Best Lawyers Selection Methodology Recognition by Best Lawyers in America® is based on a peer review process designed to capture the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical and legal practice areas. About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a global, mid-sized law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best‑in‑class client service.
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in the Legal 500 United States 2025 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan is pleased to announce that its practice groups and attorneys have been ranked and recommended in The Legal 500 United States 2025. Peers and more than 300,000 corporate counsel have been surveyed and interviewed globally in the past 12 months to assess law firms’ overall visibility and reputation, culminating in detailed rankings and editorial. The Legal 500 is an independent guide, and firms and individuals are recommended purely on merit. Sullivan's lawyers received the following rankings: Leading Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Outstanding Lawyers Nationwide Benjamin Armour - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m) Ameek Ashok Ponda - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)  Lewis Segall - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m) Douglas Stransky - International Tax Joel Telpner - Fintech Next Generation Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Up-and-Coming Lawyers Nationwide Nicole Crum - Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds Sarah Wellings - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Practice Areas Ranked and Attorneys Recognized Corporate Governance The growing corporate governance practice at Sullivan & Worcester LLP does a lot of work with funds but also is active in the healthcare, energy and biotechnology sectors. The practice is heavily involved in the governance matters brought forward by John Hancock Insurance funds, assisting independent directors and the board with risk management, beneficial cybersecurity protocols and the satisfaction of fiduciary duties. Department head Nicole Crum has a wealth of investment management experience and handles the full spectrum of governance matters from the Washington, DC office. Boston’s Howard Berkenblit is a capital markets specialist and frequently acts during IPOs and private placements to ensure that clients remain SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley compliant. In DC, David Leahy works predominantly with various investment and insurance funds, focusing on matters relating to the 1933 Securities Act and 1934 Securities Exchange Act. New York’s Domenick Pugliese and DC's David Mahaffey and John Chilton round out the leadership group. Dispute Resolution/General Commercial Disputes Sullivan & Worcester LLP handles securities, insurance, employment, tax and trade finance disputes. The team demonstrates prowess across the real estate, art, tech and cryptocurrency sectors, as well as in government investigations and white-collar defense. Gerry Silver leads the team from New York and is experienced in software, licensing and IT disputes. Practice head Patrick Dinardo in Boston represents clients in contract, trust, real estate and insolvency disputes, at both state and federal court. Also in Boston, Laura Steinberg focuses her practice on regulatory and fiduciary issues and Nicholas O’Donnell represents a diverse roster of corporations, employers, investment advisers and banks. Erika Todd, also in Boston, specialises in employment matters. In New York, Anna Lea (Setz) McNerney is another name to note, along with Boston-based Ryan Rosenblatt. Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation and Retirement Plans: Design Known by clients for its “wealth of experience and knowledge” and “ability to explain confusing issues in detail,” Sullivan & Worcester LLP’s employment and benefits practice is particularly renowned for its knowledge and experience in all areas of tax law pertaining to benefit, retirement and compensation plan design, redesign and implementation. The department is led by Boston’s David Guadagnoli, experienced in benefit, compensation and retirement plan design and compliance alike, with extensive practical experience in negotiation, and he is joined by Amy Sheridan, who specializes in documentation and compliance issues regarding benefits issues, as well as having been recognized for her skill in designing compensation agreements and analyzing ERISA and fiduciary issues. Client testimonials include: “Our Sullivan and Worcester team brings a wealth of experience and knowledge to drive positive results towards strategic initiatives while maintaining compliance in a highly complex and ever-changing regulatory environment. The team collaborates effectively to ensure that we have the right expertise and insights when faced with challenging situations.” “David Guadagnoli has been a trusted partner of our organization for a significant amount of time. This historical knowledge has provided continuity and invaluable perspective as team members change or when initiatives are revisited. David and his team are responsive when situations arise that need swift action or when guidance is needed to make key decisions.” “David Guadagnoli thinks creatively and often brings forth solutions that positively impact our organization and employees. David can be counted on to guide key leaders through complex regulatory topics in an easily understandable way to ensure details are carefully considered and the best possible decisions can be made.” “I have been able to rely on the incredible depth of knowledge within their practice, which has enabled us to rectify numerous issues faced by our clients. Their ability to explain confusing issues in detail and be understood by clients has been critical given the highly technical nature of ERISA.” “I have worked with multiple team members and am impressed by their ability to communicate what sometimes could be confusing and very technical in nature issues in a manner that can be understood by the client (non-expert).” Environment: Transactional   Fintech Sullivan & Worcester LLP fields an ‘extremely sophisticated’ New York-based team with a broad blockchain offering. The practice is led by a duo of partners lauded for their ’deep expertise’: Joel Telpner advises on digital sovereign currencies, stablecoins, and tokenized investment products, while Natalie Lederman focuses on the formation, development and sale of digital assets. Scott Kaufman leads the firm’s emerging companies and venture capital group, and in Boston, Benjamin Armour handles a range of corporate matters, with an emphasis on mergers and acquisitions, private equity and capital-raising transactions. Client testimonials include: “‘The team is extremely sophisticated, has a good sense of the business aspects of the legal subject matter, and is very responsive.” “All of the individuals with whom we worked are excellent lawyers who provide the highest quality of service.” “We engage with the Digital or Crypto Asset team at Sullivan. Their knowledge and experience are unparalleled in the sector as they have been established in the space before anyone else. They are always available at short notice, and I have yet to present a problem or an issue that they couldn't deal with in a pragmatic way with a successful outcome. Their experience spans the globe, which is critical when structuring or advising in our industry.” “Joel Telpner and Natalie Lederman have deep experience, a global outlook, and a fast and effective service. Mike Sullivan is a great negotiator and a pragmatic problem solver when conflict arises. Greatly value his level-headed approach.” Land Use/Zoning The permitting and real estate group at Sullivan & Worcester LLP is effective in gaining the necessary approvals for project development as well as representing clients in enforcement matters and land use litigation. The Boston-based team is led by Gregory Sampson, who is well-versed in the planning, permitting and development of contaminated properties, and Ashley Brooks, who heads the wider real estate group. Victor Baltera is knowledgeable in environmental due diligence and compliance issues and has advised on projects in the commercial and industrial sectors. Real estate specialists Karen Kepler and associate Ashley Tan advise on air rights, title and permitting issues affecting acquisitions and financings. M&A: Corporate and Commercial: Venture Capital and Emerging Companies Sullivan & Worcester LLP’s U.S. venture capital and emerging companies practice forms a key part of its international offering, with the team distinguished by its ability to lean on platforms in global start-up hubs such as London and Tel Aviv. From the U.S., it also maintains longstanding relationships with start-ups and funds in the Nordic region. From New York, Scott Kaufman co-heads the group and brings to bear niche expertise in representing Israeli and other international high-tech entities in U.S.-based work. Lewis Segall leads the corporate department in Boston, where he is engaged by high-growth companies and investors to handle financings, M&A and securities-related matters. M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m) Among Sullivan & Worcester LLP’s key assets, the M&A team stands out for its ability to act alongside the firm’s premier fintech practice to pack a punch in cutting-edge transactions in the online payments and cryptocurrency fields. The group’s international network, which spans offices in the UK and Israel, is also a significant draw for multinational clients. From Boston, Lewis Segall steers the corporate department, where he leverages experience in representing companies and private equity clients in deals across the energy, life sciences, TMT and manufacturing sectors. Boston-based Benjamin Armour spearheads the standalone M&A group and has an emphasis on cross-border matters. Corporate finance partner Avinash Rao and fintech and blockchain group chair Natalie Lederman are also recommended in Boston and New York, respectively. “The partners I work with are practical and experienced at business transactions. They work with us to develop a strategy and then bring in the experts to vet the strategy and help execute it.” Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds Building upon its long history of representing independent boards of directors, Sullivan & Worcester LLP is heavily involved in day-to-day operational and shareholder matters and board advice. Clients include groups of retail and variable insurance open-end funds and closed-end funds. Nicole Crum in Washington DC leads the team, who in 2024 has handled a significant amount of artificial Intelligence and cybersecurity mandates for the group, an increasing area of work. Client testimonial: “They have good knowledge and availability, which are all the things one wants out of fund and independent director counsel.” Real Estate The real estate team at Sullivan & Worcester LLP is engaged across the market, acting in a range of deals including developments, acquisitions, dispositions, financial structurings and private equity aspects. The practice is recognized for representing public and private REITs, successfully guiding its clients in a wide range of transactions, including REIT formations and conversions, equity offerings, as well as secured and unsecured financings. The team is led by John Steiner, as director of the real estate department; based in Boston, Steiner is experienced in all aspects of real estate law but focuses his practice on acquisitions, financings and development work. Working alongside Steiner in Boston is Ashley Brooks, who has extensive experience in real estate development and finance work. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Core to Sullivan & Worcester LLP’s practice is its REIT tax capabilities, which Ameek Ashok Ponda is at the helm of. Director of the firm’s tax department, Ponda concentrates largely on representing public and private REITs in structuring corporate mergers and acquisitions. Co-leading the REIT team are Angela Gomes and Louis Monti. Monti has a broad practice, representing clients in acquisitions and restructurings across a range of real estate asset classes and in multi-state portfolio transactions. Sarah Wellings is experienced in counseling on REIT-compliant structuring and federal and state tax aspects of REIT formation, conversion and liquidation matters. Shu Wei handles equity and debt financings. All aforementioned lawyers are located in Boston. Client testimonial: “Vast expertise on REIT structuring.” Tax - International Tax Based in Boston, Sullivan & Worcester LLP’s broad practice encompasses assisting clients with matters concerning U.S. and non-U.S. tax rules, double-taxation treaties, and developing tax-risk mitigation strategies for businesses engaging in cross-border transactions. The firm handles cross-border M&A transactions, financings and joint ventures and advises on international tax initiatives. Practice head Douglas Stransky assists U.S.-based clients investing in foreign jurisdictions and possesses capabilities in handling tax implications of multijurisdictional cryptocurrency and fintech-related matters. Lewis Greenwald advises on U.S. and international tax planning, tax compliance and controversy and transfer pricing issues, while Eric Rietveld concentrates his practice on the tax planning of REITs and real estate funds. Client testimonials include: “This practice is distinguished by its solid expertise in international tax law and practical approach to addressing complex issues. The team is efficient, responsive, and approachable, offering tailored solutions that address clients' needs effectively.” “The individuals I’ve worked with, particularly Douglas Stransky, stand out for their cordiality and extensive expertise in the field. He consistently demonstrates a deep understanding of international tax matters and always strives to achieve optimal outcomes for clients.” “They are highly knowledgeable. A pleasure to work with and make themselves readily available for myself and the client.” “Doug Stransky - top-level professional in knowledge and expertise. He makes himself available for clients. He also is a top-level person.” Tax - U.S. Taxes (Contentious) The Boston office of Sullivan & Worcester LLP is best known for its work in contentious matters at the local state level, with work for premier clients such as Lumen Technologies and Medtronic that encompasses a growing stream of matters at the federal level. Richard Jones is the standout partner and a key adviser on SALT litigation and transactional planning. Vastly experienced tax specialist David Nagle handles disputes with the Massachusetts Department of Revenue and the IRS, while Daniel Ryan handles federal and state tax litigation as part of a broader tax advisory practice. Caroline Kupiec is active at all levels of the audit, controversy and litigation process. Tax - U.S. Taxes (Non-Contentious) Sullivan & Worcester LLP is praised for its REIT work but is equipped to handle the full spectrum of tax matters, led by Ameek Ashok Ponda and Richard Jones in Boston. Ponda focuses on public and private REITS in the commercial and residential sector whilst Jones is knowledgeable of state and local tax matters in Massachusetts. The practice remains active in a number of sectors; they have been advising the Broadstone Group on the international tax considerations for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games. Other noteworthy figures in the team include Douglas Stransky and Sarah Wellings. About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a global, mid-sized law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.