Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Biography

David's practice consists of counseling independent directors of open-end funds, closed-end funds, exchange-traded funds and business development companies, as well as the funds themselves and their investment advisers on matters relating to the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Education
  • Harvard Law School (J.D., cum laude)
  • Columbia University (B.A., magna cum laude)
  • Phi Beta Kappa
Bar & Court Admissions
  • New York
  • District of Columbia
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Professional Qualifications
  • District of Columbia Bar Association
Awards & Honors
  • Top 10 Most Influential Registered Funds Lawyers in the USA, Business Today (2023)
  • Chambers Global, Ranked in Investment Funds (2021-2025)
  • Chambers USA, Ranked in Investment Funds (Nationwide) (2017-2026)
  • Best Lawyers in America® (2012-2026)
  • Recommended by The Legal 500 U.S. (2012-2026)
Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
Ramifications of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Open-End Investment Companies
By Domenick Pugliese and Rachael Schwartz As the outbreak of COVID-19 has spread internationally, it has impacted almost every facet of life in the United States. Financial markets too have been severely impacted with extreme levels of volatility and, for most broad market indices, the end of the recent long-running bull market. Registered investment companies such as mutual funds ("funds"), and the advisers who manage them, have also seen significant disruptions to many aspects of their businesses and operations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") has been proactive in providing relief to funds, fund boards and to investment advisers in a number of areas. Below we review some of the more significant regulatory-related initiatives implemented in the past few days by the Commission to relieve certain burdens on funds, boards and advisers. We also highlight certain questions or areas of focus which boards may wish to discuss with management in the upcoming weeks. Finally, as travel restrictions have taken wide-spread effect across the country, many boards will be looking to conduct their meetings by video or telephone conference in the coming months. We provide certain practical tips for boards and management to consider when converting the next in-person board meeting to a video or telephonic meeting. Regulatory Developments On March 13, 2020, the Commission issued an order (the "Emergency Order") providing funds, fund boards and advisers with temporary relief from certain requirement of the Investment Company Act. RELIEF RELATING TO THE IN-PERSON VOTING REQUIREMENT The Emergency Order provides that – until June 15, 2020—funds, boards and advisers will be exempt from the requirement that the following approvals must be done at an in-person meeting: Initial or annual continuance of the investment advisory (or sub-advisory) agreement or any material amendments thereto; Approval of the agreement with the principal underwriter; Approval of the auditors; Approval of 12b-1 plans or material amendments to 12b-1 plans; and Approval of interim investment advisory agreement caused by a change in control where the adviser or its controlling person receives money or other benefit. In order to take advantage of this relief, any such action must be taken at a telephonic meeting or video conference where all directors can hear each other simultaneously. At this meeting, the board must conclude that reliance on the Emergency Order is necessary or appropriate due to circumstances related to current or potential effects of COVID-19. Finally, any matters approved in reliance on the Emergency Order must be ratified at the next in-person meeting by the board, including by a majority of independent Trustees. RELIEF FROM FILING DEADLINES FOR FORM N-CEN AND N-PORT The Emergency Order provides that, with respect to funds that are required to make filings of either Form-N-CEN or N-PORT on or prior to April 30, 2020 (but after March 12, 2020), the deadline for such filing will be extended to no more than 45 days after the original due date provided: The fund determines it is unable to meet the original filing deadline due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19; The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it could not file the report on a timely basis; The estimated date by which it expects to file the report (the fund is required to file the report prior to the maximum 45 extension deadline if it is able to do so); The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with the reasons it could not file the report on a timely basis; and Once filed, the report must include a statement that the fund relied on the Emergency Order and the reasons why it was unable to file the report on a timely basis. RELIEF WITH RESPECT TO THE PREPARATION OR TRANSMITTAL OF ANNUAL AND SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS The Emergency Order provides that, with respect to funds that are required to transmit annual or semi-annual reports to shareholders on or prior to April 30, 2020 (but after March 12, 2020), the deadline for such transmittal will be extended to no more than 45 days after the original due date provided: The fund determines it is unable to prepare or transmit the report by the original deadline due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19; The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it could not transmit the report on a timely basis; The estimated date by which it expects to transmit the report (the fund is required to transmit the report prior to the maximum 45 extension deadline if it is able to do so); The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with the reasons it could not prepare or transmit the report on a timely basis; and The fund files the report with the Commission within 10 days of its transmission to shareholder. RELIEF RELATING TO PROSPECTUS DELIVERY Finally, the Emergency Order contains a statement from the Commission whereby it announced that the Commission has taken the position that it would not provide a basis for a Commission enforcement action if a registered fund does not deliver a current prospectus to investors under the following circumstances: The fund determines it is unable to deliver the prospectus on a timely basis due to circumstances related to the current or potential effects of COVID-19 The sale of shares to the investor was NOT an initial purchase by the investor of shares of the fund The fund notifies the Commission by e-mail that it is relying on the Emergency Order along with a brief description of why it or any other person required to deliver the prospectus could not deliver the prospectus on a timely basis The estimated date by which it expects to deliver the prospectus The fund includes a statement on its public website stating that it is relying on the Commission position along with the reasons it could not deliver the prospectus on a timely basis, Publishes the current prospectus on its website, and The fund was required to deliver the prospectus on or prior to April 30, 2020 and after March 12, 2020 and the prospectus will be transmitted to shareholders as soon as practicable but no later than 45 days after the original date required. Questions and Areas of Focus for Boards Relating to COVID-19 In the wake of the extreme market volatility and other uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, there are certain areas of focus and questions that boards may want to explore with management and advisers with respect to the funds they oversee. Some of these questions and areas of focus might include: Does the adviser have appropriate and effective business continuity and disaster recovery procedures in place to ensure there will be no business disruption if employees have to work remotely for an extended period of time? Has the adviser had to implement its business continuity plan as of yet? If so, have any issues been uncovered?  If not, is there increased testing to ensure that the adviser will be able to continue business operations without disruption? How has the fund’s liquidity risk management program held up in the recent market volatility? Have there been any issues meeting shareholder redemptions? Have redemptions spiked? Has there been increased call-center activity and how responsive has the call center been throughout this period? Have there been any issues with the fund’s third-party services providers, particular with respect to calculating the fund’s NAV each day? Have you had recent discussions with them about implementation of their business continuity plans and are you comfortable they can continue providing services to the fund? With the recent market volatility has there been any valuation issues? Have pricing services continued to operate and provide pricing is an acceptable manner? Has the fund’s most significant pricing services implemented their business continuity plans? Have portfolio managers of any funds encountered any significant portfolio management issues or challenges as a result of the coronavirus or market volatility, and if so, what actions have been taken? Has the adviser taken any steps to mitigate risk for any funds that have significant exposure to regions, sectors or industries that are being most affected by the coronavirus outbreak? Has the adviser put any travel restrictions in place related to portfolio manager and/or compliance due diligence trips and how is that impacting operations? Does the adviser or management see the need at this time to take advantage of any of the relief provided by the Commission in the Emergency Order? Considerations when Setting up Telephonic and Video Meetings As funds take advantage of the Emergency Order to turn their next in-person meetings into telephonic or video conferences, boards and management may wish to restructure certain portions of their meetings to better accommodate the telephone or video structure of the meetings. Many board meetings typically run 6-10 hours day and may last one or more days. In this light, it may be appropriate for boards and management to consider the following: Consider revising the meeting agenda to defer until the next in-person meeting certain agenda items which might engender a better discussion in the in-person context, such as matters relating to new business initiatives, product restructurings, fund family product rationalizations, marketing initiatives and the like; In an effort to keep the meeting manageable from the perspective of length and maintaining maximum attention span throughout the call, consider limiting verbal presentations to a critical few, with question and answer format set aside for more routine matters for which written reports have been provided; Consider scheduling a number of breaks through-out the session; Consider instructing all Trustees to inform the board if they need to step out of the meeting for any period of time; Limit participation in the meeting to critical participants and instruct all participants when speaking, to be sure to pause frequently to allow for questions. Participants need to understand that if they do not pause occasionally for questions, other participants may have difficulty breaking in with questions; Be sure that all meeting materials are provided well in advance of the meetings, with none provided only at the meeting. For example, even if technology is used which allows for all participants to simultaneously view presentations during the meeting, consider requiring that such presentations must also be provided in advance of the meeting; and If executive sessions are to be part of the meeting, consider using a technology which can confirm which parties are participating in the meeting at a given time. The situation surrounding COVID-19 remain fluid and fast developing. It is important that all Trustees remain abreast of developments and their potential impact on the funds they oversee.
Top Tier Firm, Legal 500 United States 2026
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in the Legal 500 United States 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been ranked and recommended in the Legal 500 United States 2026. The firm’s Real Estate practice was newly ranked Tier 1 in the “Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m)” category and the firm maintained rankings across a variety of practice areas. Partners Nicole Crum and John Steiner were newly ranked as Leading Partners and Ryan Rosenblatt as a Next Generation Partner. Peers and more than 300,000 corporate counsel were surveyed and interviewed globally in the past 12 months to assess law firms’ overall visibility and reputation, culminating in detailed rankings and editorial. The Legal 500 is an independent guide, and firms and individuals are recommended purely on merit. Sullivan's lawyers received the following rankings: Leading Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Outstanding Lawyers Nationwide Benjamin Armour - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) Ameek Ashok Ponda - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)  Nicole Crum - Mutual/registered/exchange-traded funds Lewis Segall - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) John Steiner - Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m) Douglas Stransky - International Tax Joel Telpner - Fintech Next Generation Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Up-and-Coming Lawyers Nationwide Ryan Rosenblatt - General commercial disputes – mid-market ($250-500m) Sarah Wellings - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Practice Areas Ranked and Attorneys Recognized Corporate Governance “Our lead partner, Nicole Crum, who leads the investment industry practice, is exceptional. She demonstrates strong industry knowledge yet is very personable and anticipates what we need to know or what we should consider doing to handle any matter. The team roll up their sleeves and provide recommendations as to how we as a board should handle any matter. Strong service commitment and work ethic!” “The team we have at Sullivan & Worcester has served our company for years and knows the management team, staff as well as our board members. They are extremely responsive and proactive and anticipate what we should be aware of, concerned about, excited about, and how to handle oversight, processes and protocols to ensure we are carrying out our fiduciary duties. The partners are experts in this industry.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: Howard Berkenblit, David Leahy Dispute Resolution/General Commercial Disputes “Diverse skillset. Client centric. Transparency. Urgency provided on all matters.” “I have worked with Gerry Silver for over 15 years and have found his pragmatic approach to complex matters refreshing. He understands our business, culture and market, and will give me his opinion in a digestible manner.” Next Generation Partner: Ryan Rosenblatt Recommended Lawyers: Gerry Silver, Patrick Dinardo, Laura Steinberg, Michael Sullivan, Amy Zuccarello, Erika Todd, Christopher Shields, Anna Lea McNerney Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation and Retirement Plans: Design “The level of expertise is top shelf. David Guadagnoli seems to know all of ERISA and IRS rulings.” “David Guadagnoli and Amy Sheridan both have superior knowledge in their respective areas. I value the ability to raise issues whether simple or complex. The firm takes the same diligent approach across all spectrums of complexity.” Recommended Lawyers: David Guadagnoli, Amy Sheridan Environment: Transactional Fintech “Sullivan & Worcester is one of the finest firms with which I have worked.” “The lawyers are excellent, and the firm consistently provides the highest quality of customer service.” Leading Partner: Joel Telpner Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman, Benjamin Armour, Scott Kaufman, Harvey Bines, Christopher Curtis Land Use/Zoning Recommended Lawyers: Gregory Sampson, Ashley Brooks, Victor Baltera, Karen Kepler, Ashley Tan M&A: Corporate and Commercial: Venture Capital and Emerging Companies Recommended Lawyers: Scott Kaufman, Lewis Segall, Benjamin Armour, Michael Student M&A: Middle-Market ($0-250m) “The partner Lewis Segall has been working with our company for 15 years and we have a good working relationship with him. He knows our history and very attentive to our needs.” “Lewis Segall is very attentive to our needs. We very much value him.” Leading Partners: Benjamin Armour, Lewis Segall Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds “Sullivan & Worcester's practice is defined by its deep expertise in investment funds and its ability to deliver clear, commercially grounded advice across the full fund lifecycle—from formation and structuring to regulatory compliance and complex transactions.” “The team is highly experienced, collaborative, and excel in efficient execution and clear communication.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: David Leahy, David Mahaffey, Rachael Schwartz Real Estate Leading Partner: John Steiner Recommended Lawyers: Ashley Brooks, Karen Kepler, Gregory Sampson, Sharon Leifer, Louis Monti, Spencer Stone, Ashley Tan Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) “We have built multiple complex and sophisticated REIT platforms over the years and worked with many top-tier REIT specialists, but Sullivan’s REIT practice is by far the best, with Sarah Wellings.” Leading Partner: Ameek Ashok Ponda Next Generation Partner: Sarah Wellings Recommended Lawyers: Angela Gomes, Louis Monti, Shu Wei, Cameron Cosby International Tax “The international collaboration with S&W is exceptional.” “What really stands out is their willingness to engage, openness to different ideas and opinions, clearly expressed expectations, and clients' objectives.” Leading Partner: Douglas Stransky Recommended Lawyers: Lewis Greenwald, Eric Rietveld Tax > US Taxes: Contentious Recommended Lawyers: Richard Jones, David Nagle, Daniel Ryan, Caroline Kupiec Tax > US Taxes: Non-Contentious “Sarah Wellings is, quite simply, the best lawyer we have ever worked with. Her expertise extends far beyond tax and REIT matters, encompassing governance, financing, and complex commercial issues. Decades of experience and technical mastery make her an indispensable partner. Sarah is our central point of contact who makes everything seamless. Her in-house counsel background gives her a unique client perspective: she anticipates needs, solves problems before they arise, and delivers concise, well-structured updates that simplify even the most intricate issues. She coordinates effortlessly with all parties involved. Her judgment is exceptional. Sarah strikes the perfect balance between comprehensive academic rigor and practical, business-oriented advice. She combines technical REIT/tax excellence with commercial instincts, ensuring every recommendation is both legally sound and strategically smart. Her ability to translate complex law into clear, actionable guidance is unmatched. Sarah is incredibly responsive without ever sacrificing quality. She treats our matters as her own, demonstrating a rare ownership mindset and collaborative spirit. Her integrity is uncompromising, giving us absolute confidence in her counsel. In short, Sarah Wellings defines legal excellence: reliable, commercially minded, and client-focused. Working with her feels like being in the safest possible hands; she consistently exceeds expectations and orchestrates complex transactions with clarity and precision.” Recommended Lawyers: Ameek Ashok Ponda, Richard Jones, Douglas Stransky, Sarah Wellings About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in Chambers USA 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been highly ranked by Chambers USA in its annual rankings of the foremost law firms and attorneys in the country. In the 2026 guide, the firm is newly ranked in Banking & Finance in Massachusetts and partner Will Hanson is newly ranked in Private Equity: Fund Formation in Massachusetts. Partner Ameek Ashok Ponda retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax and a Band 1 ranking in Massachusetts for Tax. Partner Cameron Cosby retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax. Partners Amy Sheridan and David Guadagnoli retained Band 1 rankings in Massachusetts for Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Partner Stephanie Monaco retained a Band 1 ranking nationwide in Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance. The Chambers USA guide ranks firms and attorneys annually based on in-depth research, as well as client and peer interviews. Chambers evaluates attorneys based on their legal knowledge and experience, ability and effectiveness, and client service. Sullivan Practice Group Nationwide Rankings Registered Funds REITs Sullivan Practice Group Regional Rankings Banking & Finance (Massachusetts) Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts) Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts) Litigation: General Commercial (Massachusetts) Real Estate (Massachusetts) Tax (Massachusetts) Individual Rankings/Client Comments Ashley Brooks – Real Estate (Massachusetts). “Ashley Brooks has a burgeoning Boston-based real estate practice. She routinely assists with matters pertaining to acquisitions and developments. She often works on mixed-use residential and retail projects.” "Ashley has done an excellent job of building Sullivan & Worcester's practice as well as her own reputation and quality of work." Cameron Cosby – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Cameron Cosby is commended for his strength across the REIT tax space, with notable experience of formations, M&A and debt and equity offerings.” "He is one of the most well-respected REIT tax lawyers. Cam's decades of experience advising REITs in all asset classes makes him unique among REIT tax lawyers. He is able to navigate complex and contentious transactions with no drama." David Guadagnoli – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “David Guadagnoli is an accomplished employee benefits practitioner, with notable expertise on the tax aspects of retirement plans and welfare benefits. He is also known for negotiating employment and severance agreements.” "His knowledge and ability to communicate that knowledge is the best I have come across during my years." Will Hanson – Private Equity: Fund Formation. “William Hanson of Sullivan & Worcester advises both sponsors and investors on the formation of private equity funds targeting a wide range of sectors, with a particular focus on the food and beverage industry." Will Hanson is knowledgeable, efficient and listens patiently when we discuss issues. He ensures that what we need is appropriate to our business plan." Richard Jones – Tax (Massachusetts). “Richard Jones provides transactional advice and litigation counsel to his clients across a broad range of sectors. He is noted for his expertise in relation to state and local tax matters.” David Leahy – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Leahy is valued for his astute advice to independent trustees and directors of mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.” "David is always knowledgeable, with a plethora of experience." David Mahaffey – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Mahaffey is best known for his high-level representation of independent trustees for ETFs and open- and closed-end funds.” "David is an industry exemplar with his breadth of experience and in-depth industry knowledge. He is very much a problem solver with a can-do attitude." Stephanie Monaco – Investment Funds: Regulatory and Compliance (Nationwide). “Stephanie Monaco of Sullivan & Worcester frequently advises both private and registered fund clients on SEC and ’40 Act compliance. She brings experience of working in the hedge funds sector to her private practice.” Louis Monti – REITs (Nationwide). “Louis Monti represents REIT clients in NYSE and NASDAQ-related matters. His work often includes a broad range of tax, corporate and wider finance matters.” Ameek Ashok Ponda – Tax (Massachusetts) and REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Ameek Ashok Ponda's global transactional REIT practice regularly sees him handling REIT conversions as well as M&A.” "Ameek is a great leader in the industry and helps provide detailed advice – highly trusted." Domenick Pugliese – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “Domenick Pugliese's broad capabilities enable him to handle ETFs and mutual funds matters, with particular expertise in advising independent trustees.” Nicole Rives – Private Equity, Fund Formation (Massachusetts). “Nicole Rives of Sullivan & Worcester has a broad-based private equity practice that sees her acting on behalf of both sponsors and institutional investors.” Gregory Sampson – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use (Massachusetts). “Gregory Sampson has experience across a range of real estate matters including permitting, developments, entitlements and loans.” "Greg Sampson is super smart. He continues to do wonderful things in land use development." Amy Sheridan – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “Amy Sheridan has a broad practice and regularly advises on tax compliance, as well as assisting with transactional matters. She is also well-versed in deferred compensation plans.” "Amy is exceptional in all facets of ERISA. I trust her technical skills and professionalism." Douglas Stransky – Tax (Massachusetts). “Douglas Stransky has experience advising on complex domestic and international tax planning for clients across finance, life sciences and other sectors. He leads Sullivan's international tax practice group.” "Doug's deep knowledge of the law is matched by a sharp strategic mindset and exceptional attention to detail." Sarah Wellings – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Sarah Wellings is an up-and-coming practitioner at Sullivan & Worcester who is highly regarded for her REIT tax practice. Sarah is active acting as tax counsel in REIT compliance matters.” "Sarah is detail-oriented, proactive and a true partner. She is excellent and patient with educating clients regarding matters." Amy Zuccarello – Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts). “Amy Zuccarello focuses her practice on the area of corporate trust. She often serves as counsel to creditors and debtors in Chapter 11 bankruptcies and out-of-court restructurings.” "Amy is always timely, conscientious and practical." Practices/Client Comments Banking & Finance – "The team provided creative advice in complex situations." Bankruptcy/Restructuring – "Sullivan & Worcester have a breadth of knowledge and the ability to provide necessary advice." Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation – "Sullivan & Worcester's attorneys have tremendous knowledge and the ability to share that knowledge in a clear, concise manner that assures understanding." Litigation: General Commercial – "Sullivan & Worcester is exceptional when it comes to complex litigation." Real Estate – "Sullivan's local knowledge, general expertise and good people distinguishes it." Registered Funds – "Sullivan & Worcester's team is very experienced and well-versed in a variety of topics." REITs – "Sullivan & Worcester are always available, proactive and extremely thorough. They provide practical advice, quickly analyzing changes to deal structure and recalling minute details along the way." Tax – "Sullivan & Worcester resolve issues efficiently and shows commitment to client satisfaction." About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.

David M. Leahy