Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Biography

Education
  • Boston College Law School (J.D., cum laude)
  • Boston University (B.A., summa cum laude with distinction)
Bar & Court Admissions
  • Massachusetts
  • U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Professional Qualifications
  • American Bankruptcy Institute, Northeast Conference Advisory Board
  • National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges (NCBJ), 2021 Conference Education Committee
  • United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts, Local Rules Committee
  • American Bar Association
  • Massachusetts Bar Association
  • International Women's Insolvency & Restructuring Confederation
Awards & Honors
  • Chambers USA, Recognized Practitioner in Bankruptcy/Restructuring (2022-2026)
  • Best Lawyers in America® (2025-2026)
  • Boston Magazine Top Lawyers, Bankruptcy and Workout (2021-2025)
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers (2022-2026)
  • "Rising Star," Massachusetts Super Lawyers (2009-2016)
  • Lawdragon Top 500 Leading Bankruptcy & Restructuring Lawyer (2020, 2022, 2023, 2024)
  • Recommended by The Legal 500 U.S. (2024, 2026)
  • Ranked in The Legal 500 Boston Elite for Banking and Finance (Including Restructuring) (2026)
Community Engagement
  • Belmont School Committee Member (Belmont, Massachusetts)
  • Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts, Town-Wide Service Unit Coordinator, Troop Leader and Lifetime Member
Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
Zero Degrees Celsius: The Effects of a "Crypto Winter" and Celsius’ Bankruptcy on Crypto Customers
Part 1 – Celsius Bankruptcy The Celsius Network was conceptualized as an alternative to conventional banking, offering its customers return rates of up to 20% on deposits of digital assets, and providing digital asset-collateralized loans. Celsius also promoted to customers its enhanced transparency and security in comparison to traditional banks. Because of this, many users were left shocked when, on June 12, 2022, Celsius abruptly froze all withdrawals from customer accounts. One month later, on July 13, 2022, Celsius filed for bankruptcy. As of the time of this writing, customers remain unable to withdraw from their Celsius wallets, though Celsius has filed an unresolved motion seeking to return a portion of assets to certain customers. In the wake of this filing, dozens if not hundreds of outraged customers have submitted letters to the Honorable Martin Glenn, who is presiding over the Celsius bankruptcy proceeding in the Southern District of New York. These letters have been primarily aimed at pushing back against Celsius’ intention to treat all customers as unsecured creditors, an intention which has been recorded in court filings made by Celsius.[1] Pointing to its terms of use, Celsius asserts that its customers had transferred legal and beneficial ownership of their cryptocurrency assets to Celsius, in consideration for the returns payable to customers and for the company’s participation in secured loan transactions.[2] The key question is whether the relevant digital assets remained the property of customers when they were deposited with Celsius or whether these assets became the property of Celsius when they were placed in the custody of the company. If the assets remained the property of customers, held by Celsius in a custody or trust relationship, the assets will not constitute property of the Celsius estate and generally speaking, the administration of these assets will not be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court in the Celsius Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. In contrast, if, as Celsius contends, customers did transfer legal and beneficial ownership of the assets to Celsius upon depositing them with Celsius, the funds constitute property of the Celsius bankruptcy estate, and their administration is governed by the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Customers’ rights to recover from Celsius will be as unsecured creditors of Celsius and so will be dependent upon its overall financial condition. It appears very possible that Celsius will fail to repay its creditors in full, as while it managed $25 billion in assets in October of 2021, it held only $167 million in "cash on hand"[3] and showed over $1.15 billion in liabilities[4] at the time of its bankruptcy filing. This collision of interests has led to questions regarding how cryptocurrency and other digital assets should be treated under bankruptcy law. While 21% of American adults have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency in some capacity[5], the law around how to treat this popular new class of asset remains unclear, as evidenced by the uncertainty of how the courts will treat the digital assets in the Celsius Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In light of the complex litigation looming in this case over the recovery of assets, holders of cryptocurrency and other digital assets should evaluate accessibility of those assets in case of a platform’s bankruptcy when maintaining existing investments and making future investments. Celsius has indicated that its terms and conditions do not guarantee the return of user funds in the event of insolvency. The terms and conditions of Celsius and other digital asset platforms are subject to change on a regular basis and holders of digital assets should expect that the specific terms which govern the platform and the relationship of the customers to the platform to have a significant impact on customers’ rights to recover in potential bankruptcies or restructurings in the future. To ensure that assets can be recovered in unforeseen circumstances, an understanding of legal control over deposited assets is key. To understand that legal control, we will next examine the shifting legal and regulatory landscape of this new class of assets. Part 2 – UCC Amendments’ Impact on Crypto Bankruptcies In July of this year, after Celsius filed for bankruptcy, the Uniform Law Commission and American Law Institute approved amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”) regarding emerging technologies. These new rules regarding the perfection of security interests in cryptocurrency are particularly relevant to situations like in the instant Celsius case, as the perfection of a security interest grants a creditor rights against other secured creditors whose interests are unperfected when it comes to recovering collateral from a bankrupt debtor. The guidance that these amendments provide, including the creation of an entirely new UCC Article 12,[6] may have had a significant impact on the current position of Celsius’ users had the amendments been in place at the time of Celsius’ bankruptcy (and adopted into law). Celsius’ users would have had a government-defined framework to formulate an argument that they are entitled to recover their deposited assets, on the basis that they had perfected their security interests in the deposited digital assets through control over those assets. However, much like the facts behind Celsius’ bankruptcy itself, these amendments are also untested within the courts, and there remains much uncertainty as to how courts will interpret and apply these new provisions. The new UCC provisions allow holders of "controllable electronic records" (a category that includes Ether, Bitcoin, and NFTs, among other digital assets, but excludes fiat currency, investment property, chattel paper in electronic form and certain other types of assets) to perfect their security interests through control of those controllable electronic records. Section 12-105(a) of the UCC states that control is present where a person has 1) the power to enjoy substantially all of the benefit from the record, 2) the exclusive power to prevent others enjoying the benefit of the record, and 3) the exclusive power to transfer control of the record to another person, or to cause another person to obtain control of another record as a result of the transfer of a record. In addition to these requirements, establishing control also requires that a person be able to readily identify themselves as having the elements of control listed here, through methods such as name, identifying number, cryptographic key, office, or account number. Digital asset holders should seek to ensure that their assets are being held on platforms where control of the asset remains with the user, rather than the platform. The effect of these UCC amendments will roll out as individual state legislatures decide on whether or not to adopt the amendments. Early adopters of the amendments include Iowa, Indiana, Nebraska, and New Hampshire.[7] The ultimate scale of impact of these amendments hinges on whether the amendments are widely adopted.  The recent amendments to the UCC are not the only government guidance being developed, as the White House continues to develop its framework for the development of digital assets.[8] This framework is the product of President Biden’s March 9 executive order, which aims to achieve, among other goals, an improvement in consumer protections with respect to digital assets. Though we cannot predict what form these consumer protections will take, it is important to analyze how these developments will shape cryptocurrency bankruptcies going forward, including asset classification, acceptable practices for managing user assets, and creditor priority. Though these UCC amendments were not in place in time to have a direct impact on Celsius’ bankruptcy process, they may have had a significant impact had they come into place earlier. These provisions could have allowed Celsius users to argue that they had established control through exclusive possession of their assets, which would have theoretically given them the ability to recover all or most of their assets through bankruptcy court as secured creditors who had not forfeited control of their assets to Celsius. At the same time, Celsius’ model arguably requires, by its very nature, that Celsius possess some degree of control over the transfer of customer assets. How can Celsius lend out cryptocurrencies if it does not have the authority to transfer its treasury of assets?  And if Celsius were to have permission to make those transfers, how could it be argued that users have exclusive power over transfers of those assets? Now that these UCC amendments have received final approval from the UCC co-sponsors, the American Law Institute and the Uniform Law Commission, and are being considered for adoption by the states and other U.S. jurisdictions, various cryptocurrency platforms will likely face pressure to amend their terms of service, or even the way their platforms operate, in order to allow their customers to retain the type of control that the UCC amendments contemplate. However, changing how digital asset platforms are structured and operate is often a complex, time consuming, and expensive undertaking. There are likely to be many platforms that either cannot or will not alter their structure in a way that lets users retain control over their deposited assets. Users should recognize and weigh these risks associated with retrievability of their digital assets when analyzing potential cryptocurrency platforms. Important questions about whether a platform leaves legal control of deposited assets in the user’s hands include the following: Will the platform allow other users to use or enjoy the assets? What measures are available to ensure that ownership of the asset is not transferred against the user’s wishes? What measures does the platform have available to transfer user assets? Can the asset be transferred upon the user’s request? These questions are taking on increased importance as the digital asset industry continues to experience turbulence.  Celsius is not the only major bankruptcy in the cryptocurrency sphere, as the cryptocurrency exchange FTX also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 11, 2022. FTX has joined Celsius as one of the many businesses suffering from the ongoing liquidity crisis in cryptocurrency. Those logging onto the exchange’s main website are now met with a warning that users are unable to make withdrawals, and are strongly advised against making further deposits.  FTX’s own court filings indicate that they may have over one million creditors as part of its bankruptcy proceedings. With FTX taking up the mantle as the most recently filed major crypto bankruptcy, any lessons learned by users and regulators from the Celsius case are likely to influence FTX’s now ongoing Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding. If we are indeed entering a crypto winter (or blizzard), as many in the media have postulated and as these bankruptcy cases evidence, now is the time for users to make sure they are aware of the level and nature of control they hold over their cryptocurrency assets, lest those assets become as difficult to retrieve as they were in the case of Celsius or FTX. Increased sources of government guidance may prove to be timely, if platforms continue to experience distress. We at Sullivan are here to provide clients with the combination of technological and legal expertise needed to demystify these proceedings and comply with ever-evolving governmental and regulatory guidance and laws in the digital asset space. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or if we can be of assistance. [1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/haileylennon/2022/08/01/bankrupt-crypto-lender-celsius-could-leave-customers-last-in-line-to-get-paid/?sh=27f039905fde. [2] https://celsius.network/terms-of-use. [3] https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220713005911/en/Celsius-Network-Initiates-Financial-Restructuring-to-Stabilize-Business-and-Maximize-Value-for-All-Stakeholders. [4] https://cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11749/PLEADINGS/1174910062280000000017.pdf [5] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/31/cryptocurrency-news-21percent-of-adults-have-traded-or-used-crypto-nbc-poll-shows.html. [6] https://www.uniformlaws.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=36a12016-c502-2458-d6a0-0dbe3fddaff7&forceDialog=0. [7] https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I10a8b85c11b811ed9f24ec7b211d8087/States-Begin-to-Adopt-UCC-Article-12-Covering-Digital-Assets?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). [8] https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/16/fact-sheet-white-house-releases-first-ever-comprehensive-framework-for-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/.
First Circuit Puts Universities at Risk for Claw Back of Tuition Payments
Amy Zuccarello authored the article, "First Circuit Puts Universities at Risk for Claw Back of Tuition Payments," which was published in Law.com on January 6, 2020. The article discusses the impacts of the long-awaited decision of the First Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a ruling by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts,DeGiacomo v. Sacred Heart Univ., and hold that parents did not receive “reasonably equivalent value” in exchange for the college tuition payments they made to educate their child. This decision has negative effects on colleges and universities, which risk loss because they have no control over whether a parent, student or another relative pays tuition. Amy suggests that schools consider measures to counter the risk of avoidance of tuition payments made by insolvent parents, such as requiring that students make all tuition payments directly.
Top Tier Firm, Legal 500 United States 2026
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in the Legal 500 United States 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been ranked and recommended in the Legal 500 United States 2026. The firm’s Real Estate practice was newly ranked Tier 1 in the “Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m)” category and the firm maintained rankings across a variety of practice areas. Partners Nicole Crum and John Steiner were newly ranked as Leading Partners and Ryan Rosenblatt as a Next Generation Partner. Peers and more than 300,000 corporate counsel were surveyed and interviewed globally in the past 12 months to assess law firms’ overall visibility and reputation, culminating in detailed rankings and editorial. The Legal 500 is an independent guide, and firms and individuals are recommended purely on merit. Sullivan's lawyers received the following rankings: Leading Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Outstanding Lawyers Nationwide Benjamin Armour - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) Ameek Ashok Ponda - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)  Nicole Crum - Mutual/registered/exchange-traded funds Lewis Segall - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) John Steiner - Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m) Douglas Stransky - International Tax Joel Telpner - Fintech Next Generation Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Up-and-Coming Lawyers Nationwide Ryan Rosenblatt - General commercial disputes – mid-market ($250-500m) Sarah Wellings - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Practice Areas Ranked and Attorneys Recognized Corporate Governance “Our lead partner, Nicole Crum, who leads the investment industry practice, is exceptional. She demonstrates strong industry knowledge yet is very personable and anticipates what we need to know or what we should consider doing to handle any matter. The team roll up their sleeves and provide recommendations as to how we as a board should handle any matter. Strong service commitment and work ethic!” “The team we have at Sullivan & Worcester has served our company for years and knows the management team, staff as well as our board members. They are extremely responsive and proactive and anticipate what we should be aware of, concerned about, excited about, and how to handle oversight, processes and protocols to ensure we are carrying out our fiduciary duties. The partners are experts in this industry.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: Howard Berkenblit, David Leahy Dispute Resolution/General Commercial Disputes “Diverse skillset. Client centric. Transparency. Urgency provided on all matters.” “I have worked with Gerry Silver for over 15 years and have found his pragmatic approach to complex matters refreshing. He understands our business, culture and market, and will give me his opinion in a digestible manner.” Next Generation Partner: Ryan Rosenblatt Recommended Lawyers: Gerry Silver, Patrick Dinardo, Laura Steinberg, Michael Sullivan, Amy Zuccarello, Erika Todd, Christopher Shields, Anna Lea McNerney Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation and Retirement Plans: Design “The level of expertise is top shelf. David Guadagnoli seems to know all of ERISA and IRS rulings.” “David Guadagnoli and Amy Sheridan both have superior knowledge in their respective areas. I value the ability to raise issues whether simple or complex. The firm takes the same diligent approach across all spectrums of complexity.” Recommended Lawyers: David Guadagnoli, Amy Sheridan Environment: Transactional Fintech “Sullivan & Worcester is one of the finest firms with which I have worked.” “The lawyers are excellent, and the firm consistently provides the highest quality of customer service.” Leading Partner: Joel Telpner Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman, Benjamin Armour, Scott Kaufman, Harvey Bines, Christopher Curtis Land Use/Zoning Recommended Lawyers: Gregory Sampson, Ashley Brooks, Victor Baltera, Karen Kepler, Ashley Tan M&A: Corporate and Commercial: Venture Capital and Emerging Companies Recommended Lawyers: Scott Kaufman, Lewis Segall, Benjamin Armour, Michael Student M&A: Middle-Market ($0-250m) “The partner Lewis Segall has been working with our company for 15 years and we have a good working relationship with him. He knows our history and very attentive to our needs.” “Lewis Segall is very attentive to our needs. We very much value him.” Leading Partners: Benjamin Armour, Lewis Segall Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds “Sullivan & Worcester's practice is defined by its deep expertise in investment funds and its ability to deliver clear, commercially grounded advice across the full fund lifecycle—from formation and structuring to regulatory compliance and complex transactions.” “The team is highly experienced, collaborative, and excel in efficient execution and clear communication.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: David Leahy, David Mahaffey, Rachael Schwartz Real Estate Leading Partner: John Steiner Recommended Lawyers: Ashley Brooks, Karen Kepler, Gregory Sampson, Sharon Leifer, Louis Monti, Spencer Stone, Ashley Tan Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) “We have built multiple complex and sophisticated REIT platforms over the years and worked with many top-tier REIT specialists, but Sullivan’s REIT practice is by far the best, with Sarah Wellings.” Leading Partner: Ameek Ashok Ponda Next Generation Partner: Sarah Wellings Recommended Lawyers: Angela Gomes, Louis Monti, Shu Wei, Cameron Cosby International Tax “The international collaboration with S&W is exceptional.” “What really stands out is their willingness to engage, openness to different ideas and opinions, clearly expressed expectations, and clients' objectives.” Leading Partner: Douglas Stransky Recommended Lawyers: Lewis Greenwald, Eric Rietveld Tax > US Taxes: Contentious Recommended Lawyers: Richard Jones, David Nagle, Daniel Ryan, Caroline Kupiec Tax > US Taxes: Non-Contentious “Sarah Wellings is, quite simply, the best lawyer we have ever worked with. Her expertise extends far beyond tax and REIT matters, encompassing governance, financing, and complex commercial issues. Decades of experience and technical mastery make her an indispensable partner. Sarah is our central point of contact who makes everything seamless. Her in-house counsel background gives her a unique client perspective: she anticipates needs, solves problems before they arise, and delivers concise, well-structured updates that simplify even the most intricate issues. She coordinates effortlessly with all parties involved. Her judgment is exceptional. Sarah strikes the perfect balance between comprehensive academic rigor and practical, business-oriented advice. She combines technical REIT/tax excellence with commercial instincts, ensuring every recommendation is both legally sound and strategically smart. Her ability to translate complex law into clear, actionable guidance is unmatched. Sarah is incredibly responsive without ever sacrificing quality. She treats our matters as her own, demonstrating a rare ownership mindset and collaborative spirit. Her integrity is uncompromising, giving us absolute confidence in her counsel. In short, Sarah Wellings defines legal excellence: reliable, commercially minded, and client-focused. Working with her feels like being in the safest possible hands; she consistently exceeds expectations and orchestrates complex transactions with clarity and precision.” Recommended Lawyers: Ameek Ashok Ponda, Richard Jones, Douglas Stransky, Sarah Wellings About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in Chambers USA 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been highly ranked by Chambers USA in its annual rankings of the foremost law firms and attorneys in the country. In the 2026 guide, the firm is newly ranked in Banking & Finance in Massachusetts and partner Will Hanson is newly ranked in Private Equity: Fund Formation in Massachusetts. Partner Ameek Ashok Ponda retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax and a Band 1 ranking in Massachusetts for Tax. Partner Cameron Cosby retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax. Partners Amy Sheridan and David Guadagnoli retained Band 1 rankings in Massachusetts for Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Partner Stephanie Monaco retained a Band 1 ranking nationwide in Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance. The Chambers USA guide ranks firms and attorneys annually based on in-depth research, as well as client and peer interviews. Chambers evaluates attorneys based on their legal knowledge and experience, ability and effectiveness, and client service. Sullivan Practice Group Nationwide Rankings Registered Funds REITs Sullivan Practice Group Regional Rankings Banking & Finance (Massachusetts) Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts) Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts) Litigation: General Commercial (Massachusetts) Real Estate (Massachusetts) Tax (Massachusetts) Individual Rankings/Client Comments Ashley Brooks – Real Estate (Massachusetts). “Ashley Brooks has a burgeoning Boston-based real estate practice. She routinely assists with matters pertaining to acquisitions and developments. She often works on mixed-use residential and retail projects.” "Ashley has done an excellent job of building Sullivan & Worcester's practice as well as her own reputation and quality of work." Cameron Cosby – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Cameron Cosby is commended for his strength across the REIT tax space, with notable experience of formations, M&A and debt and equity offerings.” "He is one of the most well-respected REIT tax lawyers. Cam's decades of experience advising REITs in all asset classes makes him unique among REIT tax lawyers. He is able to navigate complex and contentious transactions with no drama." David Guadagnoli – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “David Guadagnoli is an accomplished employee benefits practitioner, with notable expertise on the tax aspects of retirement plans and welfare benefits. He is also known for negotiating employment and severance agreements.” "His knowledge and ability to communicate that knowledge is the best I have come across during my years." Will Hanson – Private Equity: Fund Formation. “William Hanson of Sullivan & Worcester advises both sponsors and investors on the formation of private equity funds targeting a wide range of sectors, with a particular focus on the food and beverage industry." Will Hanson is knowledgeable, efficient and listens patiently when we discuss issues. He ensures that what we need is appropriate to our business plan." Richard Jones – Tax (Massachusetts). “Richard Jones provides transactional advice and litigation counsel to his clients across a broad range of sectors. He is noted for his expertise in relation to state and local tax matters.” David Leahy – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Leahy is valued for his astute advice to independent trustees and directors of mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.” "David is always knowledgeable, with a plethora of experience." David Mahaffey – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Mahaffey is best known for his high-level representation of independent trustees for ETFs and open- and closed-end funds.” "David is an industry exemplar with his breadth of experience and in-depth industry knowledge. He is very much a problem solver with a can-do attitude." Stephanie Monaco – Investment Funds: Regulatory and Compliance (Nationwide). “Stephanie Monaco of Sullivan & Worcester frequently advises both private and registered fund clients on SEC and ’40 Act compliance. She brings experience of working in the hedge funds sector to her private practice.” Louis Monti – REITs (Nationwide). “Louis Monti represents REIT clients in NYSE and NASDAQ-related matters. His work often includes a broad range of tax, corporate and wider finance matters.” Ameek Ashok Ponda – Tax (Massachusetts) and REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Ameek Ashok Ponda's global transactional REIT practice regularly sees him handling REIT conversions as well as M&A.” "Ameek is a great leader in the industry and helps provide detailed advice – highly trusted." Domenick Pugliese – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “Domenick Pugliese's broad capabilities enable him to handle ETFs and mutual funds matters, with particular expertise in advising independent trustees.” Nicole Rives – Private Equity, Fund Formation (Massachusetts). “Nicole Rives of Sullivan & Worcester has a broad-based private equity practice that sees her acting on behalf of both sponsors and institutional investors.” Gregory Sampson – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use (Massachusetts). “Gregory Sampson has experience across a range of real estate matters including permitting, developments, entitlements and loans.” "Greg Sampson is super smart. He continues to do wonderful things in land use development." Amy Sheridan – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “Amy Sheridan has a broad practice and regularly advises on tax compliance, as well as assisting with transactional matters. She is also well-versed in deferred compensation plans.” "Amy is exceptional in all facets of ERISA. I trust her technical skills and professionalism." Douglas Stransky – Tax (Massachusetts). “Douglas Stransky has experience advising on complex domestic and international tax planning for clients across finance, life sciences and other sectors. He leads Sullivan's international tax practice group.” "Doug's deep knowledge of the law is matched by a sharp strategic mindset and exceptional attention to detail." Sarah Wellings – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Sarah Wellings is an up-and-coming practitioner at Sullivan & Worcester who is highly regarded for her REIT tax practice. Sarah is active acting as tax counsel in REIT compliance matters.” "Sarah is detail-oriented, proactive and a true partner. She is excellent and patient with educating clients regarding matters." Amy Zuccarello – Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts). “Amy Zuccarello focuses her practice on the area of corporate trust. She often serves as counsel to creditors and debtors in Chapter 11 bankruptcies and out-of-court restructurings.” "Amy is always timely, conscientious and practical." Practices/Client Comments Banking & Finance – "The team provided creative advice in complex situations." Bankruptcy/Restructuring – "Sullivan & Worcester have a breadth of knowledge and the ability to provide necessary advice." Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation – "Sullivan & Worcester's attorneys have tremendous knowledge and the ability to share that knowledge in a clear, concise manner that assures understanding." Litigation: General Commercial – "Sullivan & Worcester is exceptional when it comes to complex litigation." Real Estate – "Sullivan's local knowledge, general expertise and good people distinguishes it." Registered Funds – "Sullivan & Worcester's team is very experienced and well-versed in a variety of topics." REITs – "Sullivan & Worcester are always available, proactive and extremely thorough. They provide practical advice, quickly analyzing changes to deal structure and recalling minute details along the way." Tax – "Sullivan & Worcester resolve issues efficiently and shows commitment to client satisfaction." About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.

Amy A. Zuccarello

Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
Zero Degrees Celsius: The Effects of a "Crypto Winter" and Celsius’ Bankruptcy on Crypto Customers
Part 1 – Celsius Bankruptcy The Celsius Network was conceptualized as an alternative to conventional banking, offering its customers return rates of up to 20% on deposits of digital assets, and providing digital asset-collateralized loans. Celsius also promoted to customers its enhanced transparency and security in comparison to traditional banks. Because of this, many users were left shocked when, on June 12, 2022, Celsius abruptly froze all withdrawals from customer accounts. One month later, on July 13, 2022, Celsius filed for bankruptcy. As of the time of this writing, customers remain unable to withdraw from their Celsius wallets, though Celsius has filed an unresolved motion seeking to return a portion of assets to certain customers. In the wake of this filing, dozens if not hundreds of outraged customers have submitted letters to the Honorable Martin Glenn, who is presiding over the Celsius bankruptcy proceeding in the Southern District of New York. These letters have been primarily aimed at pushing back against Celsius’ intention to treat all customers as unsecured creditors, an intention which has been recorded in court filings made by Celsius.[1] Pointing to its terms of use, Celsius asserts that its customers had transferred legal and beneficial ownership of their cryptocurrency assets to Celsius, in consideration for the returns payable to customers and for the company’s participation in secured loan transactions.[2] The key question is whether the relevant digital assets remained the property of customers when they were deposited with Celsius or whether these assets became the property of Celsius when they were placed in the custody of the company. If the assets remained the property of customers, held by Celsius in a custody or trust relationship, the assets will not constitute property of the Celsius estate and generally speaking, the administration of these assets will not be subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court in the Celsius Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. In contrast, if, as Celsius contends, customers did transfer legal and beneficial ownership of the assets to Celsius upon depositing them with Celsius, the funds constitute property of the Celsius bankruptcy estate, and their administration is governed by the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Customers’ rights to recover from Celsius will be as unsecured creditors of Celsius and so will be dependent upon its overall financial condition. It appears very possible that Celsius will fail to repay its creditors in full, as while it managed $25 billion in assets in October of 2021, it held only $167 million in "cash on hand"[3] and showed over $1.15 billion in liabilities[4] at the time of its bankruptcy filing. This collision of interests has led to questions regarding how cryptocurrency and other digital assets should be treated under bankruptcy law. While 21% of American adults have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrency in some capacity[5], the law around how to treat this popular new class of asset remains unclear, as evidenced by the uncertainty of how the courts will treat the digital assets in the Celsius Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In light of the complex litigation looming in this case over the recovery of assets, holders of cryptocurrency and other digital assets should evaluate accessibility of those assets in case of a platform’s bankruptcy when maintaining existing investments and making future investments. Celsius has indicated that its terms and conditions do not guarantee the return of user funds in the event of insolvency. The terms and conditions of Celsius and other digital asset platforms are subject to change on a regular basis and holders of digital assets should expect that the specific terms which govern the platform and the relationship of the customers to the platform to have a significant impact on customers’ rights to recover in potential bankruptcies or restructurings in the future. To ensure that assets can be recovered in unforeseen circumstances, an understanding of legal control over deposited assets is key. To understand that legal control, we will next examine the shifting legal and regulatory landscape of this new class of assets. Part 2 – UCC Amendments’ Impact on Crypto Bankruptcies In July of this year, after Celsius filed for bankruptcy, the Uniform Law Commission and American Law Institute approved amendments to the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”) regarding emerging technologies. These new rules regarding the perfection of security interests in cryptocurrency are particularly relevant to situations like in the instant Celsius case, as the perfection of a security interest grants a creditor rights against other secured creditors whose interests are unperfected when it comes to recovering collateral from a bankrupt debtor. The guidance that these amendments provide, including the creation of an entirely new UCC Article 12,[6] may have had a significant impact on the current position of Celsius’ users had the amendments been in place at the time of Celsius’ bankruptcy (and adopted into law). Celsius’ users would have had a government-defined framework to formulate an argument that they are entitled to recover their deposited assets, on the basis that they had perfected their security interests in the deposited digital assets through control over those assets. However, much like the facts behind Celsius’ bankruptcy itself, these amendments are also untested within the courts, and there remains much uncertainty as to how courts will interpret and apply these new provisions. The new UCC provisions allow holders of "controllable electronic records" (a category that includes Ether, Bitcoin, and NFTs, among other digital assets, but excludes fiat currency, investment property, chattel paper in electronic form and certain other types of assets) to perfect their security interests through control of those controllable electronic records. Section 12-105(a) of the UCC states that control is present where a person has 1) the power to enjoy substantially all of the benefit from the record, 2) the exclusive power to prevent others enjoying the benefit of the record, and 3) the exclusive power to transfer control of the record to another person, or to cause another person to obtain control of another record as a result of the transfer of a record. In addition to these requirements, establishing control also requires that a person be able to readily identify themselves as having the elements of control listed here, through methods such as name, identifying number, cryptographic key, office, or account number. Digital asset holders should seek to ensure that their assets are being held on platforms where control of the asset remains with the user, rather than the platform. The effect of these UCC amendments will roll out as individual state legislatures decide on whether or not to adopt the amendments. Early adopters of the amendments include Iowa, Indiana, Nebraska, and New Hampshire.[7] The ultimate scale of impact of these amendments hinges on whether the amendments are widely adopted.  The recent amendments to the UCC are not the only government guidance being developed, as the White House continues to develop its framework for the development of digital assets.[8] This framework is the product of President Biden’s March 9 executive order, which aims to achieve, among other goals, an improvement in consumer protections with respect to digital assets. Though we cannot predict what form these consumer protections will take, it is important to analyze how these developments will shape cryptocurrency bankruptcies going forward, including asset classification, acceptable practices for managing user assets, and creditor priority. Though these UCC amendments were not in place in time to have a direct impact on Celsius’ bankruptcy process, they may have had a significant impact had they come into place earlier. These provisions could have allowed Celsius users to argue that they had established control through exclusive possession of their assets, which would have theoretically given them the ability to recover all or most of their assets through bankruptcy court as secured creditors who had not forfeited control of their assets to Celsius. At the same time, Celsius’ model arguably requires, by its very nature, that Celsius possess some degree of control over the transfer of customer assets. How can Celsius lend out cryptocurrencies if it does not have the authority to transfer its treasury of assets?  And if Celsius were to have permission to make those transfers, how could it be argued that users have exclusive power over transfers of those assets? Now that these UCC amendments have received final approval from the UCC co-sponsors, the American Law Institute and the Uniform Law Commission, and are being considered for adoption by the states and other U.S. jurisdictions, various cryptocurrency platforms will likely face pressure to amend their terms of service, or even the way their platforms operate, in order to allow their customers to retain the type of control that the UCC amendments contemplate. However, changing how digital asset platforms are structured and operate is often a complex, time consuming, and expensive undertaking. There are likely to be many platforms that either cannot or will not alter their structure in a way that lets users retain control over their deposited assets. Users should recognize and weigh these risks associated with retrievability of their digital assets when analyzing potential cryptocurrency platforms. Important questions about whether a platform leaves legal control of deposited assets in the user’s hands include the following: Will the platform allow other users to use or enjoy the assets? What measures are available to ensure that ownership of the asset is not transferred against the user’s wishes? What measures does the platform have available to transfer user assets? Can the asset be transferred upon the user’s request? These questions are taking on increased importance as the digital asset industry continues to experience turbulence.  Celsius is not the only major bankruptcy in the cryptocurrency sphere, as the cryptocurrency exchange FTX also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 11, 2022. FTX has joined Celsius as one of the many businesses suffering from the ongoing liquidity crisis in cryptocurrency. Those logging onto the exchange’s main website are now met with a warning that users are unable to make withdrawals, and are strongly advised against making further deposits.  FTX’s own court filings indicate that they may have over one million creditors as part of its bankruptcy proceedings. With FTX taking up the mantle as the most recently filed major crypto bankruptcy, any lessons learned by users and regulators from the Celsius case are likely to influence FTX’s now ongoing Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding. If we are indeed entering a crypto winter (or blizzard), as many in the media have postulated and as these bankruptcy cases evidence, now is the time for users to make sure they are aware of the level and nature of control they hold over their cryptocurrency assets, lest those assets become as difficult to retrieve as they were in the case of Celsius or FTX. Increased sources of government guidance may prove to be timely, if platforms continue to experience distress. We at Sullivan are here to provide clients with the combination of technological and legal expertise needed to demystify these proceedings and comply with ever-evolving governmental and regulatory guidance and laws in the digital asset space. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or if we can be of assistance. [1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/haileylennon/2022/08/01/bankrupt-crypto-lender-celsius-could-leave-customers-last-in-line-to-get-paid/?sh=27f039905fde. [2] https://celsius.network/terms-of-use. [3] https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220713005911/en/Celsius-Network-Initiates-Financial-Restructuring-to-Stabilize-Business-and-Maximize-Value-for-All-Stakeholders. [4] https://cases.stretto.com/public/x191/11749/PLEADINGS/1174910062280000000017.pdf [5] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/31/cryptocurrency-news-21percent-of-adults-have-traded-or-used-crypto-nbc-poll-shows.html. [6] https://www.uniformlaws.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=36a12016-c502-2458-d6a0-0dbe3fddaff7&forceDialog=0. [7] https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/I10a8b85c11b811ed9f24ec7b211d8087/States-Begin-to-Adopt-UCC-Article-12-Covering-Digital-Assets?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). [8] https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/09/16/fact-sheet-white-house-releases-first-ever-comprehensive-framework-for-responsible-development-of-digital-assets/.
First Circuit Puts Universities at Risk for Claw Back of Tuition Payments
Amy Zuccarello authored the article, "First Circuit Puts Universities at Risk for Claw Back of Tuition Payments," which was published in Law.com on January 6, 2020. The article discusses the impacts of the long-awaited decision of the First Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a ruling by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts,DeGiacomo v. Sacred Heart Univ., and hold that parents did not receive “reasonably equivalent value” in exchange for the college tuition payments they made to educate their child. This decision has negative effects on colleges and universities, which risk loss because they have no control over whether a parent, student or another relative pays tuition. Amy suggests that schools consider measures to counter the risk of avoidance of tuition payments made by insolvent parents, such as requiring that students make all tuition payments directly.
Top Tier Firm, Legal 500 United States 2026
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in the Legal 500 United States 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been ranked and recommended in the Legal 500 United States 2026. The firm’s Real Estate practice was newly ranked Tier 1 in the “Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m)” category and the firm maintained rankings across a variety of practice areas. Partners Nicole Crum and John Steiner were newly ranked as Leading Partners and Ryan Rosenblatt as a Next Generation Partner. Peers and more than 300,000 corporate counsel were surveyed and interviewed globally in the past 12 months to assess law firms’ overall visibility and reputation, culminating in detailed rankings and editorial. The Legal 500 is an independent guide, and firms and individuals are recommended purely on merit. Sullivan's lawyers received the following rankings: Leading Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Outstanding Lawyers Nationwide Benjamin Armour - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) Ameek Ashok Ponda - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)  Nicole Crum - Mutual/registered/exchange-traded funds Lewis Segall - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) John Steiner - Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m) Douglas Stransky - International Tax Joel Telpner - Fintech Next Generation Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Up-and-Coming Lawyers Nationwide Ryan Rosenblatt - General commercial disputes – mid-market ($250-500m) Sarah Wellings - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Practice Areas Ranked and Attorneys Recognized Corporate Governance “Our lead partner, Nicole Crum, who leads the investment industry practice, is exceptional. She demonstrates strong industry knowledge yet is very personable and anticipates what we need to know or what we should consider doing to handle any matter. The team roll up their sleeves and provide recommendations as to how we as a board should handle any matter. Strong service commitment and work ethic!” “The team we have at Sullivan & Worcester has served our company for years and knows the management team, staff as well as our board members. They are extremely responsive and proactive and anticipate what we should be aware of, concerned about, excited about, and how to handle oversight, processes and protocols to ensure we are carrying out our fiduciary duties. The partners are experts in this industry.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: Howard Berkenblit, David Leahy Dispute Resolution/General Commercial Disputes “Diverse skillset. Client centric. Transparency. Urgency provided on all matters.” “I have worked with Gerry Silver for over 15 years and have found his pragmatic approach to complex matters refreshing. He understands our business, culture and market, and will give me his opinion in a digestible manner.” Next Generation Partner: Ryan Rosenblatt Recommended Lawyers: Gerry Silver, Patrick Dinardo, Laura Steinberg, Michael Sullivan, Amy Zuccarello, Erika Todd, Christopher Shields, Anna Lea McNerney Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation and Retirement Plans: Design “The level of expertise is top shelf. David Guadagnoli seems to know all of ERISA and IRS rulings.” “David Guadagnoli and Amy Sheridan both have superior knowledge in their respective areas. I value the ability to raise issues whether simple or complex. The firm takes the same diligent approach across all spectrums of complexity.” Recommended Lawyers: David Guadagnoli, Amy Sheridan Environment: Transactional Fintech “Sullivan & Worcester is one of the finest firms with which I have worked.” “The lawyers are excellent, and the firm consistently provides the highest quality of customer service.” Leading Partner: Joel Telpner Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman, Benjamin Armour, Scott Kaufman, Harvey Bines, Christopher Curtis Land Use/Zoning Recommended Lawyers: Gregory Sampson, Ashley Brooks, Victor Baltera, Karen Kepler, Ashley Tan M&A: Corporate and Commercial: Venture Capital and Emerging Companies Recommended Lawyers: Scott Kaufman, Lewis Segall, Benjamin Armour, Michael Student M&A: Middle-Market ($0-250m) “The partner Lewis Segall has been working with our company for 15 years and we have a good working relationship with him. He knows our history and very attentive to our needs.” “Lewis Segall is very attentive to our needs. We very much value him.” Leading Partners: Benjamin Armour, Lewis Segall Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds “Sullivan & Worcester's practice is defined by its deep expertise in investment funds and its ability to deliver clear, commercially grounded advice across the full fund lifecycle—from formation and structuring to regulatory compliance and complex transactions.” “The team is highly experienced, collaborative, and excel in efficient execution and clear communication.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: David Leahy, David Mahaffey, Rachael Schwartz Real Estate Leading Partner: John Steiner Recommended Lawyers: Ashley Brooks, Karen Kepler, Gregory Sampson, Sharon Leifer, Louis Monti, Spencer Stone, Ashley Tan Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) “We have built multiple complex and sophisticated REIT platforms over the years and worked with many top-tier REIT specialists, but Sullivan’s REIT practice is by far the best, with Sarah Wellings.” Leading Partner: Ameek Ashok Ponda Next Generation Partner: Sarah Wellings Recommended Lawyers: Angela Gomes, Louis Monti, Shu Wei, Cameron Cosby International Tax “The international collaboration with S&W is exceptional.” “What really stands out is their willingness to engage, openness to different ideas and opinions, clearly expressed expectations, and clients' objectives.” Leading Partner: Douglas Stransky Recommended Lawyers: Lewis Greenwald, Eric Rietveld Tax > US Taxes: Contentious Recommended Lawyers: Richard Jones, David Nagle, Daniel Ryan, Caroline Kupiec Tax > US Taxes: Non-Contentious “Sarah Wellings is, quite simply, the best lawyer we have ever worked with. Her expertise extends far beyond tax and REIT matters, encompassing governance, financing, and complex commercial issues. Decades of experience and technical mastery make her an indispensable partner. Sarah is our central point of contact who makes everything seamless. Her in-house counsel background gives her a unique client perspective: she anticipates needs, solves problems before they arise, and delivers concise, well-structured updates that simplify even the most intricate issues. She coordinates effortlessly with all parties involved. Her judgment is exceptional. Sarah strikes the perfect balance between comprehensive academic rigor and practical, business-oriented advice. She combines technical REIT/tax excellence with commercial instincts, ensuring every recommendation is both legally sound and strategically smart. Her ability to translate complex law into clear, actionable guidance is unmatched. Sarah is incredibly responsive without ever sacrificing quality. She treats our matters as her own, demonstrating a rare ownership mindset and collaborative spirit. Her integrity is uncompromising, giving us absolute confidence in her counsel. In short, Sarah Wellings defines legal excellence: reliable, commercially minded, and client-focused. Working with her feels like being in the safest possible hands; she consistently exceeds expectations and orchestrates complex transactions with clarity and precision.” Recommended Lawyers: Ameek Ashok Ponda, Richard Jones, Douglas Stransky, Sarah Wellings About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in Chambers USA 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been highly ranked by Chambers USA in its annual rankings of the foremost law firms and attorneys in the country. In the 2026 guide, the firm is newly ranked in Banking & Finance in Massachusetts and partner Will Hanson is newly ranked in Private Equity: Fund Formation in Massachusetts. Partner Ameek Ashok Ponda retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax and a Band 1 ranking in Massachusetts for Tax. Partner Cameron Cosby retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax. Partners Amy Sheridan and David Guadagnoli retained Band 1 rankings in Massachusetts for Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Partner Stephanie Monaco retained a Band 1 ranking nationwide in Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance. The Chambers USA guide ranks firms and attorneys annually based on in-depth research, as well as client and peer interviews. Chambers evaluates attorneys based on their legal knowledge and experience, ability and effectiveness, and client service. Sullivan Practice Group Nationwide Rankings Registered Funds REITs Sullivan Practice Group Regional Rankings Banking & Finance (Massachusetts) Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts) Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts) Litigation: General Commercial (Massachusetts) Real Estate (Massachusetts) Tax (Massachusetts) Individual Rankings/Client Comments Ashley Brooks – Real Estate (Massachusetts). “Ashley Brooks has a burgeoning Boston-based real estate practice. She routinely assists with matters pertaining to acquisitions and developments. She often works on mixed-use residential and retail projects.” "Ashley has done an excellent job of building Sullivan & Worcester's practice as well as her own reputation and quality of work." Cameron Cosby – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Cameron Cosby is commended for his strength across the REIT tax space, with notable experience of formations, M&A and debt and equity offerings.” "He is one of the most well-respected REIT tax lawyers. Cam's decades of experience advising REITs in all asset classes makes him unique among REIT tax lawyers. He is able to navigate complex and contentious transactions with no drama." David Guadagnoli – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “David Guadagnoli is an accomplished employee benefits practitioner, with notable expertise on the tax aspects of retirement plans and welfare benefits. He is also known for negotiating employment and severance agreements.” "His knowledge and ability to communicate that knowledge is the best I have come across during my years." Will Hanson – Private Equity: Fund Formation. “William Hanson of Sullivan & Worcester advises both sponsors and investors on the formation of private equity funds targeting a wide range of sectors, with a particular focus on the food and beverage industry." Will Hanson is knowledgeable, efficient and listens patiently when we discuss issues. He ensures that what we need is appropriate to our business plan." Richard Jones – Tax (Massachusetts). “Richard Jones provides transactional advice and litigation counsel to his clients across a broad range of sectors. He is noted for his expertise in relation to state and local tax matters.” David Leahy – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Leahy is valued for his astute advice to independent trustees and directors of mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.” "David is always knowledgeable, with a plethora of experience." David Mahaffey – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Mahaffey is best known for his high-level representation of independent trustees for ETFs and open- and closed-end funds.” "David is an industry exemplar with his breadth of experience and in-depth industry knowledge. He is very much a problem solver with a can-do attitude." Stephanie Monaco – Investment Funds: Regulatory and Compliance (Nationwide). “Stephanie Monaco of Sullivan & Worcester frequently advises both private and registered fund clients on SEC and ’40 Act compliance. She brings experience of working in the hedge funds sector to her private practice.” Louis Monti – REITs (Nationwide). “Louis Monti represents REIT clients in NYSE and NASDAQ-related matters. His work often includes a broad range of tax, corporate and wider finance matters.” Ameek Ashok Ponda – Tax (Massachusetts) and REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Ameek Ashok Ponda's global transactional REIT practice regularly sees him handling REIT conversions as well as M&A.” "Ameek is a great leader in the industry and helps provide detailed advice – highly trusted." Domenick Pugliese – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “Domenick Pugliese's broad capabilities enable him to handle ETFs and mutual funds matters, with particular expertise in advising independent trustees.” Nicole Rives – Private Equity, Fund Formation (Massachusetts). “Nicole Rives of Sullivan & Worcester has a broad-based private equity practice that sees her acting on behalf of both sponsors and institutional investors.” Gregory Sampson – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use (Massachusetts). “Gregory Sampson has experience across a range of real estate matters including permitting, developments, entitlements and loans.” "Greg Sampson is super smart. He continues to do wonderful things in land use development." Amy Sheridan – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “Amy Sheridan has a broad practice and regularly advises on tax compliance, as well as assisting with transactional matters. She is also well-versed in deferred compensation plans.” "Amy is exceptional in all facets of ERISA. I trust her technical skills and professionalism." Douglas Stransky – Tax (Massachusetts). “Douglas Stransky has experience advising on complex domestic and international tax planning for clients across finance, life sciences and other sectors. He leads Sullivan's international tax practice group.” "Doug's deep knowledge of the law is matched by a sharp strategic mindset and exceptional attention to detail." Sarah Wellings – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Sarah Wellings is an up-and-coming practitioner at Sullivan & Worcester who is highly regarded for her REIT tax practice. Sarah is active acting as tax counsel in REIT compliance matters.” "Sarah is detail-oriented, proactive and a true partner. She is excellent and patient with educating clients regarding matters." Amy Zuccarello – Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts). “Amy Zuccarello focuses her practice on the area of corporate trust. She often serves as counsel to creditors and debtors in Chapter 11 bankruptcies and out-of-court restructurings.” "Amy is always timely, conscientious and practical." Practices/Client Comments Banking & Finance – "The team provided creative advice in complex situations." Bankruptcy/Restructuring – "Sullivan & Worcester have a breadth of knowledge and the ability to provide necessary advice." Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation – "Sullivan & Worcester's attorneys have tremendous knowledge and the ability to share that knowledge in a clear, concise manner that assures understanding." Litigation: General Commercial – "Sullivan & Worcester is exceptional when it comes to complex litigation." Real Estate – "Sullivan's local knowledge, general expertise and good people distinguishes it." Registered Funds – "Sullivan & Worcester's team is very experienced and well-versed in a variety of topics." REITs – "Sullivan & Worcester are always available, proactive and extremely thorough. They provide practical advice, quickly analyzing changes to deal structure and recalling minute details along the way." Tax – "Sullivan & Worcester resolve issues efficiently and shows commitment to client satisfaction." About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.

Amy A. Zuccarello