Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Sullivan counsels clients across a broad range of environmental matters, including litigation, regulation, project development, remediation and corporate transactions. The breadth of our expertise and the cost-structure of our platform allow us to truly partner with our clients to strategically manage environmental risks and to capitalize on business opportunities.

Drawing on our deep industry, regulatory and transactional expertise, we bring a sophisticated understanding not only of the environmental legal framework but also the practical business implications directly affecting our clients. Sullivan is distinguished by the caliber of its environmental attorneys – which include former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division lawyers – the diversity of environmental and natural resource issues on which we advise and our thought leadership in helping clients adapt to changing market trends. By bringing together environmental practitioners recognized by Legal 500Chambers and Best Lawyers in America for their skills in litigation, regulation and transactions, Sullivan is well-positioned to counsel clients through all stages of environmental matters, as well as matters that require the consideration of environmental issues. Given the global nature of the firm's transactional practice, we also advise on cross-border and international issues and collaborate with foreign advisors to address environmental risks. To help devise innovative, tailored solutions, we also leverage the firm’s broader expertise, drawing on our real estate, tax, corporate, securities and finance practices.

Representative Client Work

Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Represent a manufacturer in an indemnity dispute with prior plant owner regarding remediation of legacy contamination
  • Advise consumer products manufacturer regarding legacy liabilities, negotiations with regulatory agencies, remedy implementation and oversight at multi-party sites in New England and Midwest under CERCLA and state laws
  • Represent generic agricultural chemical companies entering the U.S. market (including the first Indian and Korean companies to be awarded a technical registration by the U.S. EPA), involving data compensation negotiations and arbitrations, business strategy, and product defense
  • Participated in mediation and advised landowner in settling federal court litigation against lessee to recover costs incurred to remediate PCB contamination
  • Advised family farm concerning strategic options in pursuing contractual and statutory claims against logging company that created drainage and access problems on farm property
  • Successfully resolved lawsuit by California Public Health Department against laboratory operator seeking injunction to require decontamination and decommissioning of property under radiation control law and regulations. Based on administrative record developed for client in EPA’s underlying CERCLA proceeding, federal district judge declined to enforce agency’s remedial order, or require that client pay civil penalties or treble damages
  • Represented numerous clients in multi-million dollar negotiations and arbitrations addressing the compensation due for reliance upon pesticide data previously filed by competitors with EPA
  • Negotiated a substantially reduced settlement payment by auto parts manufacturer to resolve environmental cost recovery litigation with EPA and private entities by demonstrating remedy selected and performed by the agency was based on faulty conceptual site model
  • Participated in mediation and advised client on risk management issues regarding liability and allocation among parties in federal court CERCLA litigation
  • Represented a coal company in negotiations with state agency to address environmental impacts from legacy mining operations
  • Represented a real estate developer in connection with indemnity dispute regarding costs to address legacy site contamination
  • Represented landowner in connection with environmental provisions of loan documentation and environmental indemnity agreement for secured financing of multiple tracts of timberland located in eight states.
  • Served as local counsel advising secured lender as to Massachusetts wetlands and groundwater discharge permitting issues for borrower’s development of apartment complex and related wastewater treatment facility.
  • Represented landlord in connection with negotiation of environmental provisions in long term ground leases of industrial property in Hawaii and preparation with tenant of baseline environmental reports.
  • Advised travel center company in connection with contract to dispose of wastewater sludge at a Wisconsin biosolids processing facility.
  • Represented purchaser of former truck stop property in Texas regarding voluntary cleanup program, worked with consultant to evaluate site risk and advised as to requirements for site closure.
  • Advised foreign company concerning its proposed acquisition of wire-cutting business located at former military air base, including extensive review of documentation relating to site contamination and operational compliance with environmental regulations.

Transactional

  • Prepared joint portfolio development and finance agreement for solar developer with tax equity investor to fund multiple community solar projects
  • Assisted storage company in completing multiple agreements with developers for placement of rooftop solar facilities on client’s warehouses and purchase of power
  • Counseled municipality considering offshore wind power purchase, and charter school considering installation of solar rooftop facilities, regarding terms of power purchase agreements
  • Assisted investment management company in preparing private placement memorandum for a climate mitigation fund focusing on carbon sequestration and developing forestry projects to generate carbon credits
  • Advised client regarding regulatory and indemnity issues in negotiating agreement for sale of brownfield property
  • Handled environmental issues in connection with sale of wire coating business located at a former tannery, including historical site contamination, PFAS, and compliance with European Union REACH and California Proposition 65 requirements concerning use and disclosure of chemicals
  • Acted as local counsel for Japanese investor in two Massachusetts power plants including conducting diligence and documentation with respect to Clean Air Act and other environmental and land use compliance, as well as site contamination issues. Evaluated status of Energy Facilities Siting Board approval for proposed plant expansion
  • Prepared commercial contracts for Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) in export credit finance transaction to purchase, operate and maintain off-grid power plant for project in East Africa
  • Prepared environmental opinion for project finance and negotiated environmental indemnity agreements for client developing mixed use project on Boston Harbor
  • Advised client in connection with acquisition of a shipyard business as to environmental compliance including diligence with respect to site contamination and regulatory compliance issues, and documentation for the transaction
  • Represented foreign real estate investment trust in connection with environmental issues related to its initial U.S. acquisition involving 30-property portfolio, including sites subject to an environmental consent decree. Advised as to requirements and liabilities under U.S. and local environmental law
  • Handled environmental issues for borrower in connection with financing for 180 industrial properties in Hawaii. Developed plan to identify and resolve environmental issues to lender's satisfaction and negotiated environmental indemnity agreement
  • Acted as local counsel for buyer of Boston-area automobile dealerships regarding post-closing environmental issues arising under the purchase and sale agreements
  • Reviewed environmental contamination and regulatory compliance issues for investor in industrial mushroom-growing business
  • Advised client in negotiating terms of an EPC contract for development of a biotech facility at which a patented naturally occurring, sustainable biodegradable polymer will be produced
  • Advised client on environmental provisions for inclusion in framework agreement to govern joint venture to develop solar and solar plus storage facilities throughout the U.S.

Regulatory

  • Advise property owner in fulfilling remediation requirements in Consent Judgment with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and New York City Department of Environmental Protection
  • Brief clients on impact of Biden Administration’s environmental and energy priorities and policies
  • Advise clients on risk mitigation strategies to address initiatives of EPA and states concerning PFAS and other emerging contaminants
  • Assist client in developing a business that will convert swine waste to renewable natural gas, and whose operation will be powered by solar energy
  • Represents a major urban university in multiple environmental matters, including site remediation projects, permitting for renovation and new construction, and providing development and transactional support
  • Counseled government remedial contractor in addressing regulatory issues under TSCA and state law in demolition of military facility
  • Advised client in performing U.S. Trade and Development Agency-funded Feasibility Study to assess placement of off-grid hybrid power plant in Sierra Leone
  • Negotiated consent order in state pesticide enforcement matter, which included a significantly reduced penalty and a precedential environmental benefit project to underwrite the collection and environmentally sound disposal of waste pesticides
  • Successfully directed client’s vapor intrusion study required by EPA in environmental justice matter, including negotiating work scope and supervising consultant
  • Designed and supervised audit of pesticide compliance for client holding more than 100 pesticide registrations
  • Collaborated with technical consultant to obtain modifications in manufacturer’s NPDES permit to achieve compliance with effluent limits
  • Advised owner of office building as to regulatory requirements relating to asbestos notifications to tenants
  • Counseled consumer products manufacturer regarding federal and state requirements governing the marketing of “green” products
  • Evaluated “green” product claims of client’s competitors and sought action by federal and state authorities based on findings that competitors engaged in “greenwashing” by making misleading and unsubstantiated claims
  • Advised owner of former industrial site, which had previously received “no further action” determination for historic environmental contamination, regarding request by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to evaluate potential trichloroethylene contamination under new, more restrictive standards
  • Analyzed potential impact of Rivers Protection Act on proposed redevelopment of former mill property in western Massachusetts
  • Advised developer client concerning chapter 91 waterways licensing, Municipal Harborplan amendment, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) compliance, and other environmental permitting issues for mixed-use project on Boston Harbor. Worked with environmental consultant on developer's Massachusetts Contingency Plan compliance
  • Advised clients on various compliance issues under the federal Clean Air Act and State Implementation Plans
  • Represented owner of a suburban Boston office building regarding release of elevator hydraulic oil into storm drainage system leading to adjacent river, including advising as to regulatory compliance and working with owner’s consultant to prepare response action plan and site closure report.
Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
MEPA Issues Straw Proposals to Update Climate Resiliency and Greenhouse Gas Policies – Comments Due September 16th
The Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office in the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EOEEA) has floated two straw proposals (available here) outlining conceptual frameworks to update the 2021 MEPA Interim Protocol on Climate Change Adaptation and Resiliency (Resiliency Policy) and the 2010 MEPA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Policy and Protocol. The existing Resiliency Policy requires that Environmental Notification Forms (ENF) include information on adaptation strategies to mitigate climate risk to projects, while the GHG Policy provides guidance for preparing GHG emissions analyses in connection with Environmental Impact Reports (EIR). Public comments on each of the straw proposals are due by September 16, 2024. Upon review of the comments, the MEPA Office will issue the complete text of updated policies for an additional round of public comments. The anticipated effective date of the two policies’ updates is the winter or spring of 2025. Climate Resiliency Policy Proposal The Resiliency Policy was created to better assess the potential impact of extreme weather and climate change on development projects that are subject to MEPA. After reviewing project data collected since the Resiliency Policy went into effect three years ago, the MEPA Office is now seeking to strengthen the Policy. Potential changes include (i) updates to the ENF form to provide more information on climate risk and mitigation and (ii) requirements for EIRs to include additional analysis to evaluate and mitigate climate-related environmental harm. Under the straw proposal, all new projects filed with the MEPA Office will continue to be required to submit a standard output report generated from the Massachusetts Resilience Design Tool (Resilience Tool), a custom software that creates automated projections of climate impact and recommends best practices for development. In addition, the ENF or Expanded Environmental Notification Form (EENF) for new projects must discuss the project’s climate resiliency. The ENF template will be revised to include: Identification of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zones and Base Flood Elevations (BFE), if established; Useful life of the project (user input); Climate hazard exposure score and key scoring rationale (from the Resilience Tool’s output report); Asset risk rating, planning horizons, and return period recommendations (a metric used to estimate the frequency of the occurrence of natural disasters) (from the output report) for the Project’s “primary” assets; Discussion of whether the project is anticipated to be consistent with the Tool’s recommendations; and Descriptions of resiliency measures incorporated into the project. Additional analysis will be required for EIRs, which will aim to address whether a project is consistent with Resilience Tool recommendations. Project proponents will need to first consult numeric values from the Resilience Tool. However, they may use additional site-specific methodology to provide an alternative analysis if they are able to justify why a site-specific approach is needed and demonstrate use of the best available data. If a project does not meet Resilience Tool recommendations, project proponents will need to explain whether alternative designs and locations were considered for the project, what flexible adaptation strategies will be implemented, and how the project will comply with local and state mandates. Proponents will be directed to consult best practices described in the ResilientMass Action Team (RMAT) Climate Resilience Design Guidelines, a document that provides guidance on how to implement recommended standards, to assess the criticality and useful life of a project. The Secretary of the EOEEA may require revisions of an output report at her discretion. The straw proposal calls for EIRs, at minimum, to analyze the following: elevation above water levels of buildings and infrastructure, stormwater sizing, and ability to withstand extreme heat.  Natural resource projects will need to discuss ecosystem benefits. In each analysis, the Resilience Tool recommendations will be used for guidance, and projects that do not comply with those recommendations must provide justification for their plans. The elevation category applies to new or substantial improvements to any buildings or facilities and above-ground infrastructure. The stormwater sizing analysis applies to new or significant improvements to stormwater management systems. The extreme heat category mandates a report on the anticipated increase in the number of days with temperatures over 90° under projected future climate conditions, including ways in which a project might reduce extreme heat risks, implement low-impact development strategies (LID) strategies, and increase tree planting or cooling spaces. In specific cases, the EIR scope might also require analysis of other factors such as on- and offsite flood impacts, sizing of culverts, and coastal erosion rates. Best practices to be employed in the analysis would include using a 40 to 60-year lifespan for hard structures and assigning most assets a medium or high criticality.  The straw proposal applies the climate resiliency analysis requirements to all EIRs, whether mandatory or discretionary. Notices of Project Change (NPC) will require submission of a climate output report. Moreover, projects subject to Special Review Procedures (SRP) may be required to conduct a resiliency analysis at the Secretary’s discretion. Notably, under a “de minimis” exception analysis will not be required if a project is “not exposed” to any climate parameter. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Policy Proposal The current MEPA GHG Policy provides guidance on how a project’s GHG emissions should be calculated in an EIR in order to evaluate mitigation of potential climate impacts. The EIR must calculate both estimated GHG emissions for a project baseline and estimated emissions reductions compared to the baseline due to mitigation measures for various project alternatives. Review of stationary sources must quantify energy use and associated GHG emissions from new buildings with the baseline case reflecting construction in accordance with the standard Massachusetts building code. Mitigation is expressed as a percentage improvement over building code requirements. Where applicable, emissions from industrial processes also need to be identified. Review of mobile sources must be based on a traffic study quantifying estimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and discuss mitigation measures to be taken. Other sources of GHG emissions might include a large amount of forest or land clearing, construction activity, or other large land uses. All projects subject to the policy must file a GHG self-certification with the MEPA Office confirming completion of required mitigation.  The straw proposal contemplates updates for analysis of a project’s stationary sources, mobile sources, land alteration, and carbon emissions impact. For stationary sources (buildings), the straw proposal suggests various potential updates to enhance overall energy efficiency for Massachusetts projects. First, the MEPA review process would be simplified by creating review “opt-outs” for projects that commit to MEPA-recommended best practices, whereas all other projects would have standard reviews requiring full GHG analysis. The recommended best practices will primarily align with the GHG reduction strategies of the 2023 Stretch Energy and Municipal Opt-In Specialized Building Codes. Second, mitigation commitments will be expressed as a percentage better than legally mandated codes with new metrics developed to show building performance improvements. Finally, the methodology used to consider energy efficiency will now use the context of a thirty-year look ahead period rather than improvements over a single year. By considering expected future reductions in GHG emissions from the electric grid, the EIR analysis can more fully capture the benefits of electrification and other GHG mitigation for individual projects. Regarding mobile sources, GHG Policy updates include technical edits to align with existing practice based on current traffic study methodology. Currently, projects need to compare only the GHG emissions of a project build without mitigation scenario versus those emissions if mitigation efforts were taken. The straw proposal adds two new comparisons: (1) comparing the existing GHG emission levels to future GHG levels without the project; and (2) comparing the future GHG levels without the project to the future GHG levels if the project were built. Lastly, the GHG updates for mobile sources change the methodology for reporting of VMT to facilitate tracking the state’s progress towards the Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan (CECP) goals, implementing a standard methodology using publicly available mapping resources and providing guidance on mitigation strategies. For land alteration, the straw proposal recommends eliminating the numerical acreage threshold currently used to trigger the GHG analysis and instead requiring the analysis for all projects that meet or exceed any MEPA land alteration threshold. In addition, the proposed updates include the development of carbon accounting methodology to be used to estimate GHG impacts of forest conversion. For example, the MEPA Office will establish a standard methodology by using publicly available mapping resources and will provide mitigation options such as reuse of wood products, tree planting programs, and heat reduction strategies. The proposal also suggests the creation of a mitigation fund to offset carbon impacts of tree clearing. Ultimately, the GHG Policy land alteration updates aim to add 64,400 acres of new tree cover and conserve 40% of Massachusetts lands and waters permanently.  The straw proposal also focuses on understanding the social cost of carbon which is an estimate of the monetary costs of environmental damage by each additional ton of carbon emissions. The proposed GHG Policy would recommend that the MEPA Office follow the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in recent National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidance to require Social Cost of Carbon (SC-C) analysis in environmental reviews at the MEPA Secretary’s discretion on a case-by-case basis. The comment period on both straw proposals remains open through September 16. Comments may be submitted to the MEPA Office at this link.
Environmental Considerations
Victor Baltera and Jeffrey Karp co-authored "Environmental Considerations," chapter 8 of the MCLE's Organizing, Financing, and Advising a Massachusetts Business, published on February 17, 2022. This chapter provides guidance for business lawyers on the environmental laws and causes of action that pose the greatest financial risks to businesses, developers, and lenders. It focuses principally on liability for hazardous substance contamination under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and G.L. c. 21E. The chapter concludes with a discussion of state and federal “brownfields” programs and an overview of environmental disclosure requirements imposed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The full chapter may be accessed here. More information about the full publication may be accessed here.
Top Tier Firm, Legal 500 United States 2026
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in the Legal 500 United States 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been ranked and recommended in the Legal 500 United States 2026. The firm’s Real Estate practice was newly ranked Tier 1 in the “Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m)” category and the firm maintained rankings across a variety of practice areas. Partners Nicole Crum and John Steiner were newly ranked as Leading Partners and Ryan Rosenblatt as a Next Generation Partner. Peers and more than 300,000 corporate counsel were surveyed and interviewed globally in the past 12 months to assess law firms’ overall visibility and reputation, culminating in detailed rankings and editorial. The Legal 500 is an independent guide, and firms and individuals are recommended purely on merit. Sullivan's lawyers received the following rankings: Leading Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Outstanding Lawyers Nationwide Benjamin Armour - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) Ameek Ashok Ponda - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)  Nicole Crum - Mutual/registered/exchange-traded funds Lewis Segall - M&A: Middle-Market (Sub-$500m); M&A: middle-market ($0-250m) John Steiner - Real estate – mid-market ($0-500m) Douglas Stransky - International Tax Joel Telpner - Fintech Next Generation Partners: The Legal 500’s Guide to Up-and-Coming Lawyers Nationwide Ryan Rosenblatt - General commercial disputes – mid-market ($250-500m) Sarah Wellings - Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Practice Areas Ranked and Attorneys Recognized Corporate Governance “Our lead partner, Nicole Crum, who leads the investment industry practice, is exceptional. She demonstrates strong industry knowledge yet is very personable and anticipates what we need to know or what we should consider doing to handle any matter. The team roll up their sleeves and provide recommendations as to how we as a board should handle any matter. Strong service commitment and work ethic!” “The team we have at Sullivan & Worcester has served our company for years and knows the management team, staff as well as our board members. They are extremely responsive and proactive and anticipate what we should be aware of, concerned about, excited about, and how to handle oversight, processes and protocols to ensure we are carrying out our fiduciary duties. The partners are experts in this industry.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: Howard Berkenblit, David Leahy Dispute Resolution/General Commercial Disputes “Diverse skillset. Client centric. Transparency. Urgency provided on all matters.” “I have worked with Gerry Silver for over 15 years and have found his pragmatic approach to complex matters refreshing. He understands our business, culture and market, and will give me his opinion in a digestible manner.” Next Generation Partner: Ryan Rosenblatt Recommended Lawyers: Gerry Silver, Patrick Dinardo, Laura Steinberg, Michael Sullivan, Amy Zuccarello, Erika Todd, Christopher Shields, Anna Lea McNerney Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation and Retirement Plans: Design “The level of expertise is top shelf. David Guadagnoli seems to know all of ERISA and IRS rulings.” “David Guadagnoli and Amy Sheridan both have superior knowledge in their respective areas. I value the ability to raise issues whether simple or complex. The firm takes the same diligent approach across all spectrums of complexity.” Recommended Lawyers: David Guadagnoli, Amy Sheridan Environment: Transactional Fintech “Sullivan & Worcester is one of the finest firms with which I have worked.” “The lawyers are excellent, and the firm consistently provides the highest quality of customer service.” Leading Partner: Joel Telpner Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman, Benjamin Armour, Scott Kaufman, Harvey Bines, Christopher Curtis Land Use/Zoning Recommended Lawyers: Gregory Sampson, Ashley Brooks, Victor Baltera, Karen Kepler, Ashley Tan M&A: Corporate and Commercial: Venture Capital and Emerging Companies Recommended Lawyers: Scott Kaufman, Lewis Segall, Benjamin Armour, Michael Student M&A: Middle-Market ($0-250m) “The partner Lewis Segall has been working with our company for 15 years and we have a good working relationship with him. He knows our history and very attentive to our needs.” “Lewis Segall is very attentive to our needs. We very much value him.” Leading Partners: Benjamin Armour, Lewis Segall Recommended Lawyers: Natalie Lederman Mutual/Registered/Exchange-Traded Funds “Sullivan & Worcester's practice is defined by its deep expertise in investment funds and its ability to deliver clear, commercially grounded advice across the full fund lifecycle—from formation and structuring to regulatory compliance and complex transactions.” “The team is highly experienced, collaborative, and excel in efficient execution and clear communication.” Leading Partner: Nicole Crum Recommended Lawyers: David Leahy, David Mahaffey, Rachael Schwartz Real Estate Leading Partner: John Steiner Recommended Lawyers: Ashley Brooks, Karen Kepler, Gregory Sampson, Sharon Leifer, Louis Monti, Spencer Stone, Ashley Tan Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) “We have built multiple complex and sophisticated REIT platforms over the years and worked with many top-tier REIT specialists, but Sullivan’s REIT practice is by far the best, with Sarah Wellings.” Leading Partner: Ameek Ashok Ponda Next Generation Partner: Sarah Wellings Recommended Lawyers: Angela Gomes, Louis Monti, Shu Wei, Cameron Cosby International Tax “The international collaboration with S&W is exceptional.” “What really stands out is their willingness to engage, openness to different ideas and opinions, clearly expressed expectations, and clients' objectives.” Leading Partner: Douglas Stransky Recommended Lawyers: Lewis Greenwald, Eric Rietveld Tax > US Taxes: Contentious Recommended Lawyers: Richard Jones, David Nagle, Daniel Ryan, Caroline Kupiec Tax > US Taxes: Non-Contentious “Sarah Wellings is, quite simply, the best lawyer we have ever worked with. Her expertise extends far beyond tax and REIT matters, encompassing governance, financing, and complex commercial issues. Decades of experience and technical mastery make her an indispensable partner. Sarah is our central point of contact who makes everything seamless. Her in-house counsel background gives her a unique client perspective: she anticipates needs, solves problems before they arise, and delivers concise, well-structured updates that simplify even the most intricate issues. She coordinates effortlessly with all parties involved. Her judgment is exceptional. Sarah strikes the perfect balance between comprehensive academic rigor and practical, business-oriented advice. She combines technical REIT/tax excellence with commercial instincts, ensuring every recommendation is both legally sound and strategically smart. Her ability to translate complex law into clear, actionable guidance is unmatched. Sarah is incredibly responsive without ever sacrificing quality. She treats our matters as her own, demonstrating a rare ownership mindset and collaborative spirit. Her integrity is uncompromising, giving us absolute confidence in her counsel. In short, Sarah Wellings defines legal excellence: reliable, commercially minded, and client-focused. Working with her feels like being in the safest possible hands; she consistently exceeds expectations and orchestrates complex transactions with clarity and precision.” Recommended Lawyers: Ameek Ashok Ponda, Richard Jones, Douglas Stransky, Sarah Wellings About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan & Worcester Ranked in Chambers USA 2026 Edition
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester announced that its practice groups and attorneys have been highly ranked by Chambers USA in its annual rankings of the foremost law firms and attorneys in the country. In the 2026 guide, the firm is newly ranked in Banking & Finance in Massachusetts and partner Will Hanson is newly ranked in Private Equity: Fund Formation in Massachusetts. Partner Ameek Ashok Ponda retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax and a Band 1 ranking in Massachusetts for Tax. Partner Cameron Cosby retained a Band 1 nationwide ranking for REITs: Tax. Partners Amy Sheridan and David Guadagnoli retained Band 1 rankings in Massachusetts for Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation. Partner Stephanie Monaco retained a Band 1 ranking nationwide in Investment Funds: Regulatory & Compliance. The Chambers USA guide ranks firms and attorneys annually based on in-depth research, as well as client and peer interviews. Chambers evaluates attorneys based on their legal knowledge and experience, ability and effectiveness, and client service. Sullivan Practice Group Nationwide Rankings Registered Funds REITs Sullivan Practice Group Regional Rankings Banking & Finance (Massachusetts) Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts) Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts) Litigation: General Commercial (Massachusetts) Real Estate (Massachusetts) Tax (Massachusetts) Individual Rankings/Client Comments Ashley Brooks – Real Estate (Massachusetts). “Ashley Brooks has a burgeoning Boston-based real estate practice. She routinely assists with matters pertaining to acquisitions and developments. She often works on mixed-use residential and retail projects.” "Ashley has done an excellent job of building Sullivan & Worcester's practice as well as her own reputation and quality of work." Cameron Cosby – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Cameron Cosby is commended for his strength across the REIT tax space, with notable experience of formations, M&A and debt and equity offerings.” "He is one of the most well-respected REIT tax lawyers. Cam's decades of experience advising REITs in all asset classes makes him unique among REIT tax lawyers. He is able to navigate complex and contentious transactions with no drama." David Guadagnoli – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “David Guadagnoli is an accomplished employee benefits practitioner, with notable expertise on the tax aspects of retirement plans and welfare benefits. He is also known for negotiating employment and severance agreements.” "His knowledge and ability to communicate that knowledge is the best I have come across during my years." Will Hanson – Private Equity: Fund Formation. “William Hanson of Sullivan & Worcester advises both sponsors and investors on the formation of private equity funds targeting a wide range of sectors, with a particular focus on the food and beverage industry." Will Hanson is knowledgeable, efficient and listens patiently when we discuss issues. He ensures that what we need is appropriate to our business plan." Richard Jones – Tax (Massachusetts). “Richard Jones provides transactional advice and litigation counsel to his clients across a broad range of sectors. He is noted for his expertise in relation to state and local tax matters.” David Leahy – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Leahy is valued for his astute advice to independent trustees and directors of mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.” "David is always knowledgeable, with a plethora of experience." David Mahaffey – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “David Mahaffey is best known for his high-level representation of independent trustees for ETFs and open- and closed-end funds.” "David is an industry exemplar with his breadth of experience and in-depth industry knowledge. He is very much a problem solver with a can-do attitude." Stephanie Monaco – Investment Funds: Regulatory and Compliance (Nationwide). “Stephanie Monaco of Sullivan & Worcester frequently advises both private and registered fund clients on SEC and ’40 Act compliance. She brings experience of working in the hedge funds sector to her private practice.” Louis Monti – REITs (Nationwide). “Louis Monti represents REIT clients in NYSE and NASDAQ-related matters. His work often includes a broad range of tax, corporate and wider finance matters.” Ameek Ashok Ponda – Tax (Massachusetts) and REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Ameek Ashok Ponda's global transactional REIT practice regularly sees him handling REIT conversions as well as M&A.” "Ameek is a great leader in the industry and helps provide detailed advice – highly trusted." Domenick Pugliese – Registered Funds (Nationwide). “Domenick Pugliese's broad capabilities enable him to handle ETFs and mutual funds matters, with particular expertise in advising independent trustees.” Nicole Rives – Private Equity, Fund Formation (Massachusetts). “Nicole Rives of Sullivan & Worcester has a broad-based private equity practice that sees her acting on behalf of both sponsors and institutional investors.” Gregory Sampson – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use (Massachusetts). “Gregory Sampson has experience across a range of real estate matters including permitting, developments, entitlements and loans.” "Greg Sampson is super smart. He continues to do wonderful things in land use development." Amy Sheridan – Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Massachusetts). “Amy Sheridan has a broad practice and regularly advises on tax compliance, as well as assisting with transactional matters. She is also well-versed in deferred compensation plans.” "Amy is exceptional in all facets of ERISA. I trust her technical skills and professionalism." Douglas Stransky – Tax (Massachusetts). “Douglas Stransky has experience advising on complex domestic and international tax planning for clients across finance, life sciences and other sectors. He leads Sullivan's international tax practice group.” "Doug's deep knowledge of the law is matched by a sharp strategic mindset and exceptional attention to detail." Sarah Wellings – REITs: Tax (Nationwide). “Sarah Wellings is an up-and-coming practitioner at Sullivan & Worcester who is highly regarded for her REIT tax practice. Sarah is active acting as tax counsel in REIT compliance matters.” "Sarah is detail-oriented, proactive and a true partner. She is excellent and patient with educating clients regarding matters." Amy Zuccarello – Bankruptcy/Restructuring (Massachusetts). “Amy Zuccarello focuses her practice on the area of corporate trust. She often serves as counsel to creditors and debtors in Chapter 11 bankruptcies and out-of-court restructurings.” "Amy is always timely, conscientious and practical." Practices/Client Comments Banking & Finance – "The team provided creative advice in complex situations." Bankruptcy/Restructuring – "Sullivan & Worcester have a breadth of knowledge and the ability to provide necessary advice." Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation – "Sullivan & Worcester's attorneys have tremendous knowledge and the ability to share that knowledge in a clear, concise manner that assures understanding." Litigation: General Commercial – "Sullivan & Worcester is exceptional when it comes to complex litigation." Real Estate – "Sullivan's local knowledge, general expertise and good people distinguishes it." Registered Funds – "Sullivan & Worcester's team is very experienced and well-versed in a variety of topics." REITs – "Sullivan & Worcester are always available, proactive and extremely thorough. They provide practical advice, quickly analyzing changes to deal structure and recalling minute details along the way." Tax – "Sullivan & Worcester resolve issues efficiently and shows commitment to client satisfaction." About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.

Environment & Natural Resources

Environmental Technology Company Acquires a Leading Industrial Air Filtration Company

The environmental technology company, Nederman Holding AB, represented by Sullivan, recently acquired a leading industrial air filtration company RoboVent, significantly strengthening its North American position by becoming the number one player within the U.S. weld fume extraction segment. Sullivan has provided acquisition advice to Nederman since 2017. Sullivan’s Environment & Natural Resources group handled preparation of environmental provisions of the purchase agreement and disclosure schedules and advised as to regulatory compliance at the target company.

Michael J. Student, Avinash R. Rao, Amy E. Sheridan, Erika L. Todd, Douglas S. Stransky and Ida J. Vanto

Thermal Energy Storage Company Shares to Commence Trading on Nasdaq

Sullivan advised Brenmiller Energy Ltd., a designer, builder and operator of thermal energy storage systems, in its $15 million private placement of ordinary shares and uplisting of ordinary shares to Nasdaq. The Company develops storage-based generation systems that combines thermal storage, inherent heat exchanging, and inherent steam generation in one unit.

Oded Har-Even, Reut Alfiah, Eric Victorson, Gal Cohen, Ilana Neck Levin and Emily A. Goldschmidt

Solar Panel On Field Against Sky

City-Owned Parking Lot Redeveloped into Three-Building Campus

Sullivan represents client FoxRock Properties concerning environmental issues related to its pursuit to redevelop the 2.3-acre former City-owned Ross Parking Lot into a three-building life science campus featuring retail and office space.

The redevelopment of this property has involved a multi-year negotiation with the City of Quincy, remediation of the development site, coordination with an adjacent City infrastructure project and permitting. At full build, the campus will total over one half million square feet and will play an important part in the revitalization of Quincy Center.

Environment & Natural Resources