Sullivan
Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Sullivan website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.

Biography

Carole is the leader of Sullivan's Private Clients/Trusts & Estates Practice Group. She advises high-net-worth individuals, multigenerational families, family offices and fiduciaries in all aspects of estate and wealth transfer and trust planning. She works closely with individuals and families to structure sophisticated, tax-efficient plans designed to minimize estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes and to effectuate non-tax objectives.

Carole also represents clients in the preparation and negotiation of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, advises on estate planning issues arising from divorce and remarriage and is nationally recognized for advising clients on cutting-edge estate planning issues involving the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Her practice also includes working with clients on estate administration and representing individual and corporate fiduciaries and estate beneficiaries in Surrogate’s Court proceedings.

Carole is a peer-elected Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) and frequently lectures on topics relating to assisted reproductive technology, estate planning and divorce, and premarital agreements. She has presented to national and local professional organizations, including the Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning, the American Bar Association (Real Property, Trusts and Estates Section and Family Law Section), the American Academy of Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys, the New York State Society of CPAs and the New York City Estate Planning Council. Her articles on these topics have appeared in publications such as Trusts & Estates Magazine, Estate Planning Magazine and the New York Law Journal and she has been quoted in national publications, including the Wall Street Journal and Forbes.

Education
  • Cornell University Law School (J.D.)
  • S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications, Syracuse University (M.S.)
  • State University of New York at Binghamton (B.A.)
Bar & Court Admissions
  • New York
  • Connecticut
  • U.S. Tax Court
Professional Qualifications
  • Fellow, American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC)
    • Member, ACTEC Family Law Task Force
    • Member, ACTEC Programming Committee
  • American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Real Property, Trust and Estate Law (RPTE)
    • Member, RPTE Section Council
    • Advisor, Standing Committee on Continuing Legal Education
    • Immediate Past Co-Chair, Standing Committee on Continuing Legal Education
    • Council Representative, Charitable Organizations Group
    • Advisor, Standing Committee on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Awards & Honors
  • Best Lawyers in America® (2024-2027)
  • Chambers USA High Net Worth Guide, Private Wealth Law: Mid-Market – New York (2025-2026)
  • New York Super Lawyers (2013-2026)
Community Engagement
  • Board of Directors, Gilda's Club Westchester
Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
New York's Medical Aid in Dying Act: Eligibility, Requirements and Planning Considerations
On August 5, 2026, Article 28-F of the New York Public Health Law (the “Medical Aid in Dying Act” or the “Act”) became effective, creating a framework under which, in certain limited circumstances, terminally ill New York residents may request and self-administer medication intended to hasten death.[i] Although narrow in its scope, the Medical Aid in Dying Act serves as a reminder of the importance of advanced healthcare planning and clearly communicating end-of-life preferences to your healthcare agent.  Overview of the Medical Aid in Dying Act  To qualify for medical aid in dying under the Act, an individual must: be at least 18 years old; be a resident of New York (have a New York address that is their place of abode)[ii]; have a terminal illness or condition expected to result in death within six months, as determined by the individual’s attending physician, and confirmed by a consulting physician; possess decision-making capacity, as confirmed by the attending physician, consulting physician and a mental health professional; and be physically capable of self-administering the prescribed medication.[iii] Importantly, the Act requires the individual to personally request and pursue the process. Family members, healthcare agents, agents acting under powers of attorney and other representatives may not request medication on behalf of another person.[iv] Procedural Requirements  The Act establishes a multi-step process for requesting medical aid in dying. First, an individual seeking medication under the Act must make an oral and written request to the attending physician who is primarily responsible for the individual’s care. The written request must be signed and dated by the individual and witnessed by two adults.[v] Relatives, persons who may benefit financially from the individual’s death and agents acting under a healthcare proxy or power of attorney are prohibited from serving as a witness.[vi] The request must be directly submitted to the individual’s attending physician.[vii]The oral request must be recorded by audio or video and provided to the attending physician. It must then be stored in the individual’s medical records. Upon receipt of the request, the physician must discuss the individual's diagnosis and prognosis, the nature of the medication to be prescribed, the potential risks associated with its use, and feasible alternatives, including palliative or hospice care, with the individual. A mental health evaluation is also required to confirm that the individual possesses the requisite decision-making capacity.[viii] Following the required evaluations and approvals, the Act imposes a five-day waiting period before medication may be dispensed. An individual may rescind a request at any point.[ix] The Act does not require physicians to participate in providing medical aid in dying, and a physician may decline to participate. End-of-Life Planning Considerations  The Medical Aid in Dying Act introduces a new end-of-life option for certain terminally ill New Yorkers while incorporating procedural safeguards intended to ensure that decisions are made voluntarily and with informed consent.[x] Although the Act is limited in its application, its enactment highlights broader planning considerations. Individuals may wish to review their existing healthcare and estate planning documents to ensure that they reflect their current wishes and to communicate those preferences to family members, healthcare providers, agents acting under healthcare directives or powers of attorney and other trusted advisors. For More Information If you would like additional information regarding the Medical Aid in Dying Act, its eligibility requirements, the procedural safeguards established by the statute or the planning considerations it may present for you or your family, please contact the Sullivan & Worcester LLP attorney with whom you regularly work or any of the attorneys listed below. This Client Alert has been prepared by Carole M. Bass, Esq., a Partner, Molly E. Depew, an Associate, and Elizabeth Johnson, an Associate, in the Private Client practice group of the international law firm of Sullivan & Worcester LLP. For more information, Ms. Bass may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-4047 or by email at cbass@sullivanlaw.com; Ms. Depew may be reached at our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3091 or by email at mdepew@sullivanlaw.com; and Ms. Johnson may be reached in our New York office by calling +1 (212) 660-3006 or by email at ejohnson@sullivanlaw.com. This Client Alert is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. [i] N.Y. Pub. Health Law art. 28-F; 2025 N.Y. Laws ch. 714, as amended by 2026 N.Y. Laws ch. 1.  [ii] New York State Department of Health, Medical Aid in Dying Law Frequently Asked Questions ("The Medical Aid in Dying law does not define the term 'resident.' The patient must have a New York State address that is the address of the patient's place of abode, not merely a mailing address. The patient must live in New York State. Patients are required to attest to their New York State residency."). [iii] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d(3) (defining “decision-making capacity”), 2899-d(9) (defining “medically confirmed”), 2899-d(17) (defining “terminal illness or condition”), 2899-e(2)(a) (requiring that the attending physician determine that the individual has a terminal illness or condition and that such determination be medically confirmed by a consulting physician), 2899-h (setting forth the consulting physician's responsibilities with respect to confirmation of the individual's diagnosis, decision-making capacity, and informed decision), and 2899-i (requiring evaluation by a mental health professional to determine whether the individual has decision-making capacity to make an informed decision). [iv] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d, 2899-e; New York State Department of Health, Medical Aid in Dying Law Frequently Asked Questions (explaining that a request must come directly from the patient and may not be made by an agent or surrogate).  [v] § 2899-e(3). [vi] Id. §§ 2899-e, 2899-k.  [vii] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d(2), 2899-e(1). [viii] Id. §§ 2899-f, 2899-i.  [ix] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-f, 2899-g.  [x] See generally N.Y. Pub. Health Law art. 28-F. 
Client Alert Update: Litigation Challenges Implementation of NYC’s Pied-à-Terre Tax
Since the publication of this Client Alert on July 30, 2026, several significant developments have affected the implementation of NYC’s Non-Primary Residence Surcharge (the “Pied-à-Terre Tax”), including the NYC Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) extending the deadline for property owners to submit exemption applications to September 18, 2026. On August 7, 2026, three NYC homeowners filed a lawsuit challenging the City’s implementation of the surcharge, including the City’s process of identifying properties as potentially subject to the surcharge and requiring owners to establish their eligibility for an exemption. Of note, the lawsuit does not challenge the validity of the surcharge itself. Implementation of the surcharge has been temporarily halted by the issuance on August 10, 2026 of a temporary restraining order by NYS Supreme Court Justice Wayne Ozzi. The City has appealed the order, indicating that it will continue implementing the surcharge while the appeal proceeds. The Non-Primary Residence Surcharge remains part of New York law. Property owners who have received a notice and believe they qualify for an exemption should continue to follow the NYC DOF’s current procedures, including the September 18, 2026 deadline, unless and until the NYC DOF or a court directs otherwise. Sullivan & Worcester LLP will continue to monitor developments concerning the surcharge and the pending litigation and provide further updates as appropriate. For More Information Sullivan & Worcester LLP advises clients on a broad range of private client, estate planning, trust and estate administration, tax, and real property matters. Questions regarding the Non-Primary Residence Surcharge, its application to a particular property or ownership structure, exemption eligibility, valuation issues, or related compliance matters may be directed to your regular Sullivan & Worcester attorney or any member of our Private Client Group. This Client Alert has been prepared by Carole M. Bass, Esq., a Partner, Douglas P. Schneidman, a Partner, Steven M. Cunningham, a Partner, and Molly E. Depew, an Associate, in the Private Client practice group of the international law firm of Sullivan & Worcester LLP. For more information, Ms. Bass may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-4047 or by email at cbass@sullivanlaw.com; Mr. Schneidman may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3086 or by email at dschneidman@sullivanlaw.com; Mr. Cunningham may be reached at our Boston Office by calling +1 (617) 338-2432 or by email at scunningham@sullivanlaw.com; Ms. Depew may be reached at our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3091 or by email at mdepew@sullivanlaw.com. This Client Alert is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
44 Sullivan & Worcester Lawyers Selected as “Best Lawyers” Award Recipients
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester today announced that 44 lawyers were recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers in America®. 40 of the firm’s lawyers in Boston, New York and Washington, D.C. were selected as “Best Lawyers in America®,” and four Sullivan lawyers were recognized as “Ones to Watch” in the U.S. Best Lawyers in America® The firm’s 2027 Best Lawyers in Boston include Victor Baltera (Environmental Law, Real Estate Law); Howard Berkenblit (Corporate Governance Law, Corporate Law); Harvey Bines (Corporate Compliance Law, Corporate Governance Law, Corporate Law); Ashley Brooks (Real Estate Law); Joel Carpenter (Tax Law); Henry Comstock, Jr. (Trusts and Estates); Christopher Curtis (Tax Law); Patrick Dinardo (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation - Bankruptcy); John Graham (Nonprofit / Charities Law, Tax Law); David Guadagnoli (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, Tax Law); Warren Heilbronner (Real Estate Law); Zachary Hyde (Patent Law); Richard Jones (Tax Law); Karen Kepler (Real Estate Law); Caroline Kupiec (Tax Law); Thomas Meyers (Patent Law); Lisa Mingolla (Trusts and Estates); Louis Monti (Real Estate Law); Cornelius Murray III (Trusts and Estates); David Nagle (Litigation and Controversy - Tax, Tax Law); Ameek Ashok Ponda (Tax Law); Gregory Sampson (Environmental Law, Land Use and Zoning Law, Real Estate Law); Lewis Segall (Corporate Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law); Amy Sheridan (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, Tax Law); Laura Steinberg (Commercial Litigation); John Steiner (Real Estate Law); Douglas Stransky (Tax Law); Sarah Wellings (Tax Law); and Amy Zuccarello (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation - Bankruptcy). Sullivan’s 2027 Best Lawyers in Washington, D.C. include John Chilton (Mutual Funds Law); Cameron Cosby (Tax Law); Nicole Crum (Mutual Funds Law); David Leahy (Mutual Funds Law); David Mahaffey (Mutual Funds Law, Securities Regulation); and Stephanie Monaco (Corporate Law, Mutual Funds Law, Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law, Securities Regulation). The firm’s 2027 Best Lawyers in New York include Carole Bass (Trusts and Estates); J. Truman Bidwell, Jr. (Corporate Law); Domenick Pugliese (Mutual Funds Law); Constantine Ralli (Trusts and Estates); and Marc Stern (Trusts and Estates). Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch Awardees Best Lawyers awards this recognition to attorneys who are earlier in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. Sullivan’s lawyers earning this award include Alexander Gansebom (Corporate Governance and Compliance Law, Corporate Law, Health Care Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law, Real Estate Law); Emily Goldschmidt (Corporate Law); Ryan Rosenblatt (Commercial Litigation); and Ashley Tan (Real Estate Law). Best Lawyers Selection Methodology Recognition by Best Lawyers in America® is based on a peer review process designed to capture the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical and legal practice areas. About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier, AmLaw 200 international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan Ranked in 2026 Chambers High Net Worth Guide
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester has announced that the firm and its attorneys have been highly ranked in the 2026 Chambers High Net Worth Guide. In the 2026 Guide, the firm and partner Carole Bass were again ranked in the Private Wealth Law: Mid-Market – New York category, with partner Douglas Schneidman newly ranked. Rankings are based on extensive research and interviews with peers and clients around the country. The qualities assessed include technical legal ability, professional conduct, client service, commercial awareness/astuteness, diligence, commitment and other qualities most valued by the client. Client Comments and Editorial from Chambers Private Wealth Law: Mid-Market – New York “Sullivan & Worcester advises families, fiduciaries and family offices on domestic and international estate planning, administration, and charitable and lifetime gifting.” “The Sullivan & Worcester team were excellent at managing complex issues pertaining to the execution of wills, trusts and estates.” “I found Sullivan & Worcester to be very responsive, professional and smart.” “Sullivan & Worcester's advice is comprehensive, timely and detailed. It takes into account multiple stakeholders and challenges, and they provide clarification for issues that are complex.” “Carole Bass advises affluent clients on their estate and wealth transfer planning.” “Carole Bass offers excellent advice and counsel. I look forward to continuing to work with her.” “I found Carole to be very professional, reasonable and knowledgeable.” “Douglas Schneidman regularly advises high net worth individuals on trust and estate matters.” “I have had only favourable experiences with all clients I've referred to Douglas Schneidman.” “Douglas's abilities and professionalism play well at all levels of net worth and complexity.” About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier, AmLaw 200 international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.

Carole M. Bass

Carole M. Bass

Carole is the leader of Sullivan's Private Clients/Trusts & Estates Practice Group. She advises high-net-worth individuals, multigenerational families, family offices and fiduciaries in all aspects of estate and wealth transfer and trust planning. She works closely with individuals and families to structure sophisticated, tax-efficient plans designed to minimize estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes and to effectuate non-tax objectives.

Carole also represents clients in the preparation and negotiation of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, advises on estate planning issues arising from divorce and remarriage and is nationally recognized for advising clients on cutting-edge estate planning issues involving the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Her practice also includes working with clients on estate administration and representing individual and corporate fiduciaries and estate beneficiaries in Surrogate’s Court proceedings.

Carole is a peer-elected Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) and frequently lectures on topics relating to assisted reproductive technology, estate planning and divorce, and premarital agreements. She has presented to national and local professional organizations, including the Heckerling Institute on Estate Planning, the American Bar Association (Real Property, Trusts and Estates Section and Family Law Section), the American Academy of Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys, the New York State Society of CPAs and the New York City Estate Planning Council. Her articles on these topics have appeared in publications such as Trusts & Estates Magazine, Estate Planning Magazine and the New York Law Journal and she has been quoted in national publications, including the Wall Street Journal and Forbes.

Viewpoints
All Viewpoints
New York's Medical Aid in Dying Act: Eligibility, Requirements and Planning Considerations
On August 5, 2026, Article 28-F of the New York Public Health Law (the “Medical Aid in Dying Act” or the “Act”) became effective, creating a framework under which, in certain limited circumstances, terminally ill New York residents may request and self-administer medication intended to hasten death.[i] Although narrow in its scope, the Medical Aid in Dying Act serves as a reminder of the importance of advanced healthcare planning and clearly communicating end-of-life preferences to your healthcare agent.  Overview of the Medical Aid in Dying Act  To qualify for medical aid in dying under the Act, an individual must: be at least 18 years old; be a resident of New York (have a New York address that is their place of abode)[ii]; have a terminal illness or condition expected to result in death within six months, as determined by the individual’s attending physician, and confirmed by a consulting physician; possess decision-making capacity, as confirmed by the attending physician, consulting physician and a mental health professional; and be physically capable of self-administering the prescribed medication.[iii] Importantly, the Act requires the individual to personally request and pursue the process. Family members, healthcare agents, agents acting under powers of attorney and other representatives may not request medication on behalf of another person.[iv] Procedural Requirements  The Act establishes a multi-step process for requesting medical aid in dying. First, an individual seeking medication under the Act must make an oral and written request to the attending physician who is primarily responsible for the individual’s care. The written request must be signed and dated by the individual and witnessed by two adults.[v] Relatives, persons who may benefit financially from the individual’s death and agents acting under a healthcare proxy or power of attorney are prohibited from serving as a witness.[vi] The request must be directly submitted to the individual’s attending physician.[vii]The oral request must be recorded by audio or video and provided to the attending physician. It must then be stored in the individual’s medical records. Upon receipt of the request, the physician must discuss the individual's diagnosis and prognosis, the nature of the medication to be prescribed, the potential risks associated with its use, and feasible alternatives, including palliative or hospice care, with the individual. A mental health evaluation is also required to confirm that the individual possesses the requisite decision-making capacity.[viii] Following the required evaluations and approvals, the Act imposes a five-day waiting period before medication may be dispensed. An individual may rescind a request at any point.[ix] The Act does not require physicians to participate in providing medical aid in dying, and a physician may decline to participate. End-of-Life Planning Considerations  The Medical Aid in Dying Act introduces a new end-of-life option for certain terminally ill New Yorkers while incorporating procedural safeguards intended to ensure that decisions are made voluntarily and with informed consent.[x] Although the Act is limited in its application, its enactment highlights broader planning considerations. Individuals may wish to review their existing healthcare and estate planning documents to ensure that they reflect their current wishes and to communicate those preferences to family members, healthcare providers, agents acting under healthcare directives or powers of attorney and other trusted advisors. For More Information If you would like additional information regarding the Medical Aid in Dying Act, its eligibility requirements, the procedural safeguards established by the statute or the planning considerations it may present for you or your family, please contact the Sullivan & Worcester LLP attorney with whom you regularly work or any of the attorneys listed below. This Client Alert has been prepared by Carole M. Bass, Esq., a Partner, Molly E. Depew, an Associate, and Elizabeth Johnson, an Associate, in the Private Client practice group of the international law firm of Sullivan & Worcester LLP. For more information, Ms. Bass may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-4047 or by email at cbass@sullivanlaw.com; Ms. Depew may be reached at our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3091 or by email at mdepew@sullivanlaw.com; and Ms. Johnson may be reached in our New York office by calling +1 (212) 660-3006 or by email at ejohnson@sullivanlaw.com. This Client Alert is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. [i] N.Y. Pub. Health Law art. 28-F; 2025 N.Y. Laws ch. 714, as amended by 2026 N.Y. Laws ch. 1.  [ii] New York State Department of Health, Medical Aid in Dying Law Frequently Asked Questions ("The Medical Aid in Dying law does not define the term 'resident.' The patient must have a New York State address that is the address of the patient's place of abode, not merely a mailing address. The patient must live in New York State. Patients are required to attest to their New York State residency."). [iii] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d(3) (defining “decision-making capacity”), 2899-d(9) (defining “medically confirmed”), 2899-d(17) (defining “terminal illness or condition”), 2899-e(2)(a) (requiring that the attending physician determine that the individual has a terminal illness or condition and that such determination be medically confirmed by a consulting physician), 2899-h (setting forth the consulting physician's responsibilities with respect to confirmation of the individual's diagnosis, decision-making capacity, and informed decision), and 2899-i (requiring evaluation by a mental health professional to determine whether the individual has decision-making capacity to make an informed decision). [iv] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d, 2899-e; New York State Department of Health, Medical Aid in Dying Law Frequently Asked Questions (explaining that a request must come directly from the patient and may not be made by an agent or surrogate).  [v] § 2899-e(3). [vi] Id. §§ 2899-e, 2899-k.  [vii] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-d(2), 2899-e(1). [viii] Id. §§ 2899-f, 2899-i.  [ix] N.Y. Pub. Health Law §§ 2899-f, 2899-g.  [x] See generally N.Y. Pub. Health Law art. 28-F. 
Client Alert Update: Litigation Challenges Implementation of NYC’s Pied-à-Terre Tax
Since the publication of this Client Alert on July 30, 2026, several significant developments have affected the implementation of NYC’s Non-Primary Residence Surcharge (the “Pied-à-Terre Tax”), including the NYC Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) extending the deadline for property owners to submit exemption applications to September 18, 2026. On August 7, 2026, three NYC homeowners filed a lawsuit challenging the City’s implementation of the surcharge, including the City’s process of identifying properties as potentially subject to the surcharge and requiring owners to establish their eligibility for an exemption. Of note, the lawsuit does not challenge the validity of the surcharge itself. Implementation of the surcharge has been temporarily halted by the issuance on August 10, 2026 of a temporary restraining order by NYS Supreme Court Justice Wayne Ozzi. The City has appealed the order, indicating that it will continue implementing the surcharge while the appeal proceeds. The Non-Primary Residence Surcharge remains part of New York law. Property owners who have received a notice and believe they qualify for an exemption should continue to follow the NYC DOF’s current procedures, including the September 18, 2026 deadline, unless and until the NYC DOF or a court directs otherwise. Sullivan & Worcester LLP will continue to monitor developments concerning the surcharge and the pending litigation and provide further updates as appropriate. For More Information Sullivan & Worcester LLP advises clients on a broad range of private client, estate planning, trust and estate administration, tax, and real property matters. Questions regarding the Non-Primary Residence Surcharge, its application to a particular property or ownership structure, exemption eligibility, valuation issues, or related compliance matters may be directed to your regular Sullivan & Worcester attorney or any member of our Private Client Group. This Client Alert has been prepared by Carole M. Bass, Esq., a Partner, Douglas P. Schneidman, a Partner, Steven M. Cunningham, a Partner, and Molly E. Depew, an Associate, in the Private Client practice group of the international law firm of Sullivan & Worcester LLP. For more information, Ms. Bass may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-4047 or by email at cbass@sullivanlaw.com; Mr. Schneidman may be reached in our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3086 or by email at dschneidman@sullivanlaw.com; Mr. Cunningham may be reached at our Boston Office by calling +1 (617) 338-2432 or by email at scunningham@sullivanlaw.com; Ms. Depew may be reached at our New York Office by calling +1 (212) 660-3091 or by email at mdepew@sullivanlaw.com. This Client Alert is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
44 Sullivan & Worcester Lawyers Selected as “Best Lawyers” Award Recipients
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester today announced that 44 lawyers were recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers in America®. 40 of the firm’s lawyers in Boston, New York and Washington, D.C. were selected as “Best Lawyers in America®,” and four Sullivan lawyers were recognized as “Ones to Watch” in the U.S. Best Lawyers in America® The firm’s 2027 Best Lawyers in Boston include Victor Baltera (Environmental Law, Real Estate Law); Howard Berkenblit (Corporate Governance Law, Corporate Law); Harvey Bines (Corporate Compliance Law, Corporate Governance Law, Corporate Law); Ashley Brooks (Real Estate Law); Joel Carpenter (Tax Law); Henry Comstock, Jr. (Trusts and Estates); Christopher Curtis (Tax Law); Patrick Dinardo (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation - Bankruptcy); John Graham (Nonprofit / Charities Law, Tax Law); David Guadagnoli (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, Tax Law); Warren Heilbronner (Real Estate Law); Zachary Hyde (Patent Law); Richard Jones (Tax Law); Karen Kepler (Real Estate Law); Caroline Kupiec (Tax Law); Thomas Meyers (Patent Law); Lisa Mingolla (Trusts and Estates); Louis Monti (Real Estate Law); Cornelius Murray III (Trusts and Estates); David Nagle (Litigation and Controversy - Tax, Tax Law); Ameek Ashok Ponda (Tax Law); Gregory Sampson (Environmental Law, Land Use and Zoning Law, Real Estate Law); Lewis Segall (Corporate Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law); Amy Sheridan (Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, Tax Law); Laura Steinberg (Commercial Litigation); John Steiner (Real Estate Law); Douglas Stransky (Tax Law); Sarah Wellings (Tax Law); and Amy Zuccarello (Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Litigation - Bankruptcy). Sullivan’s 2027 Best Lawyers in Washington, D.C. include John Chilton (Mutual Funds Law); Cameron Cosby (Tax Law); Nicole Crum (Mutual Funds Law); David Leahy (Mutual Funds Law); David Mahaffey (Mutual Funds Law, Securities Regulation); and Stephanie Monaco (Corporate Law, Mutual Funds Law, Private Funds / Hedge Funds Law, Securities Regulation). The firm’s 2027 Best Lawyers in New York include Carole Bass (Trusts and Estates); J. Truman Bidwell, Jr. (Corporate Law); Domenick Pugliese (Mutual Funds Law); Constantine Ralli (Trusts and Estates); and Marc Stern (Trusts and Estates). Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch Awardees Best Lawyers awards this recognition to attorneys who are earlier in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. Sullivan’s lawyers earning this award include Alexander Gansebom (Corporate Governance and Compliance Law, Corporate Law, Health Care Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law, Real Estate Law); Emily Goldschmidt (Corporate Law); Ryan Rosenblatt (Commercial Litigation); and Ashley Tan (Real Estate Law). Best Lawyers Selection Methodology Recognition by Best Lawyers in America® is based on a peer review process designed to capture the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical and legal practice areas. About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier, AmLaw 200 international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.
Sullivan Ranked in 2026 Chambers High Net Worth Guide
Boston, MA – Sullivan & Worcester has announced that the firm and its attorneys have been highly ranked in the 2026 Chambers High Net Worth Guide. In the 2026 Guide, the firm and partner Carole Bass were again ranked in the Private Wealth Law: Mid-Market – New York category, with partner Douglas Schneidman newly ranked. Rankings are based on extensive research and interviews with peers and clients around the country. The qualities assessed include technical legal ability, professional conduct, client service, commercial awareness/astuteness, diligence, commitment and other qualities most valued by the client. Client Comments and Editorial from Chambers Private Wealth Law: Mid-Market – New York “Sullivan & Worcester advises families, fiduciaries and family offices on domestic and international estate planning, administration, and charitable and lifetime gifting.” “The Sullivan & Worcester team were excellent at managing complex issues pertaining to the execution of wills, trusts and estates.” “I found Sullivan & Worcester to be very responsive, professional and smart.” “Sullivan & Worcester's advice is comprehensive, timely and detailed. It takes into account multiple stakeholders and challenges, and they provide clarification for issues that are complex.” “Carole Bass advises affluent clients on their estate and wealth transfer planning.” “Carole Bass offers excellent advice and counsel. I look forward to continuing to work with her.” “I found Carole to be very professional, reasonable and knowledgeable.” “Douglas Schneidman regularly advises high net worth individuals on trust and estate matters.” “I have had only favourable experiences with all clients I've referred to Douglas Schneidman.” “Douglas's abilities and professionalism play well at all levels of net worth and complexity.” About Sullivan Sullivan & Worcester (Sullivan) is a premier, AmLaw 200 international law firm with lawyers in Boston, London, New York, Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Sullivan’s clients, including Fortune 500 companies, leading financial services firms and asset managers, boards of directors, real estate companies, and emerging businesses, rely on Sullivan’s ability to navigate complex legal and operational landscapes, the impeccable judgment of its lawyers, and its commitment to best-in-class client service.