Media Coverage - Oracle USA, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Richard Jones presented oral argument on behalf of Oracle USA, Inc. and Microsoft in the case of Oracle USA, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on February 1, 2021.
The case, which the SJC transferred sua sponte from the Massachusetts Appeals Court, concerns taxpayers’ rights to apportion Massachusetts sales tax with respect to software purchased for use in multiple states. The case raises important issues concerning the Massachusetts Commissioner of Revenue’s authority, including whether it may promulgate substantive tax law and curtail taxpayers’ statutory abatement rights via regulation.
At oral argument Rich explained that the Massachusetts Constitution vests the Legislature with the exclusive authority to impose tax, and contends that the Commissioner has authority only to determine how, and not whether, sales tax from software sales may be apportioned. He further argued that the Commissioner’s regulation did not (and indeed, could not) abridge a taxpayer’s right to seek apportionment through the statutory abatement process.
Caroline Kupiec is also counsel in the case.
Video of the argument can be found here.
Media coverage of the case has been substantial:
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Should Uphold Right To Sales Tax Abatement (3/1/21) Tax Notes
- Tax Treatment of Multi-State Use of Software Before the SJC (2/11/21) Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
- Outline of Oral Argument Presented on Behalf of Oracle USA, Inc. and Microsoft in the Case of Oracle USA, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue (2/2/21) Tax Notes
- Rich Jones Argues Before SJC in Support of Taxpayers Oracle USA and Microsoft in Oracle, USA v. Commissioner of Revenue (2/1/21) Oral Argument Archives
- Microsoft Can't Apportion Sales Tax, Mass. Justices Told (2/1/21) Law360